U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency

Synonyms: FBP1 Deficiency; FBPase Deficiency; Fructose 1,6 Diphosphatase Deficiency

, MBBS, DCH, DNB (Ped), MS, , MBBS, MD, DrNB, and , MBBS, MS, DNB (OBG), DrNB (Medical Genetics).

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: ; Last Update: July 7, 2026.

Estimated reading time: 27 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency is characterized by episodic acute crises of lactic acidosis and ketotic hypoglycemia, manifesting as respiratory distress or hyperventilation, apneic spells, seizures, and/or lethargy/coma. Acute crises are most common in early childhood; nearly half of affected children have hypoglycemia in the neonatal period (especially the first four days) resulting from deficient glycogen stores. Common factors known to trigger episodes include fever, fasting, decreased oral intake, vomiting, infections, and ingestion of large amounts of fructose. In between acute episodes, children are asymptomatic. While the majority of affected children have normal growth and psychomotor development, a few have intellectual disability, presumably due to early and prolonged hypoglycemia. In untreated individuals, clinical manifestations worsen progressively as continued catabolism leads to multiorgan failure (especially liver, brain, and later heart). Morbidity and mortality are high. Sepsis, blindness, and Reye syndrome-like presentation have been reported.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of FBP1 deficiency is established in a proband with suggestive clinical and metabolic findings and biallelic pathogenic variants in FBP1 identified by molecular genetic testing and/or deficient FBP1 activity in liver or mononuclear white blood cells.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Management of acute crisis includes increasing frequency of carbohydrate feedings; intake of glucose polymers; restriction of fructose, sucrose, glycerol, and sorbitol; measurement of blood gas, serum glucose, blood urea nitrogen, electrolytes, lactate, complete blood count, blood culture, and urine ketones; treatment with antipyretics for fever that do not contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, and/or sorbitol. Acute inpatient treatment includes intravenous glucose with transition to feeds as tolerated; sodium bicarbonate may be required for treatment of acidemia. Long-term management includes prevention of hypoglycemia with avoidance of fasting, frequent meals, (including use of uncooked cornstarch overnight), and restriction of foods or medicines that contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, and/or sorbitol; routine immunizations, including influenza vaccine to reduce the risk of infection; appropriate management of acute intercurrent illnesses; planning prior to procedures and surgeries to prevent hypoglycemia; written protocols for medical management of illness or catabolic stressors and to optimize social and school services; developmental and educational support as needed; transitional care plan.

Surveillance: Monitor growth and developmental milestones in children at each visit; neuropsychologic testing as needed; assess quality of life issues for individuals and their parents/caregivers; monitor for excessive weight gain at each visit.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Food items or medicines that contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, and/or sorbitol, especially during acute crisis in infancy or early childhood. Although small amounts of fructose (≤2 g/kg/day) are generally well tolerated, single ingestion of a high dose of fructose (>1g/kg) is harmful, especially in younger children. Fructose tolerance testing (fructose challenge) to diagnose FBP1 deficiency can be hazardous and should not be performed.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: Offer molecular genetic testing for the familial FBP1 pathogenic variants to apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from prompt initiation of measures to prevent acute crises and prompt treatment of infections/febrile illnesses.

Pregnancy management: For a pregnant woman with FBP1 deficiency, consider referral to a high-risk obstetric center and consultation with a metabolic physician. Frequent home glucose monitoring and consumption of uncooked cornstarch at night as needed as carbohydrate requirements increase during pregnancy. During labor, continuous glucose infusion is recommended to maintain euglycemia.

Genetic counseling.

FBP1 deficiency is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an FBP1 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and being affected, a 50% chance of inheriting a heterozygous pathogenic variant and being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants and being unaffected and not a carrier. Once the FBP1 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, carrier testing for at-risk relatives and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

Formal diagnostic criteria for fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency have not been established.

Suggestive Findings

FBP1 deficiency should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and metabolic findings.

Clinical findings

  • Episodes of acute crisis manifesting as respiratory distress or hyperventilation, apneic spells, seizures, and/or lethargy/coma, most commonly in neonates and infants. The course of illness is precipitous and may be lethal if untreated, especially in neonates and infants.
  • Other features may include episodic irritability, somnolence, hypotonia, tachycardia, dyspnea, and hyperhidrosis.
  • Hepatomegaly is common during acute illness.
  • Normal development and growth between crises

Metabolic findings

  • Hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <40mg/dL in neonates; <60 mg/dL in older infants, children, and adults; reference range: 70-120 mg/dL)
  • High anion-gap metabolic acidosis
    • Lactic acidemia (plasma lactate >4 mmol/L; reference range: 0.5-2.2 mmol/L), pH <7.35, with possible elevated lactate-to-pyruvate ratio, bicarbonate <20 mmol/L, and hyperalaninemia
    • Ketosis (Individuals with normal to low ketones have been reported.)
  • Urine organic acids show elevated glycerol 3-phosphate and glycerol during acute crisis; glycerol 3-phosphate concentration returns to normal following resolution of metabolic crisis [Moey et al 2018].
  • Pseudo-hypertriglyceridemia. Although plasma triglycerides are commonly increased, it is not the triglycerides but the glycerol levels that are high (often referred to as "pseudo-hypertriglyceridemia"). Most standard biochemical tests for plasma triglycerides cannot distinguish between glycerol and triglycerides, leading to an overestimation of triglyceride levels because of the high glycerol concentration in plasma [Afroze et al 2013]. Glycerol blanking methods can be used to measure the true levels of triglycerides [Cole 1990].
  • Hyperuricemia (plasma uric acid >5.0 mg/dL; reference range: 2.0-5.0 mg/dL)
  • Increased free fatty acids in plasma (in some individuals)

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of FBP1 deficiency is established in a proband with suggestive clinical and metabolic findings and biallelic pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants in FBP1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1) and/or deficient FBP1 enzyme activity in liver or mononuclear white blood cells. Molecular genetic testing is generally preferred because of its widespread availability and accuracy.

Note: (1) Per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics / Association for Molecular Pathology variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of biallelic FBP1 variants of uncertain significance (or of one known FBP1 pathogenic variant and one FBP1 variant of uncertain significance) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved (see Option 1), whereas comprehensive genomic testing does not (see Option 2).

Option 1

Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of FBP1 is performed first to detect missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions. Note: Depending on the sequencing method used, single-exon, multiexon, or whole-gene deletions/duplications may not be detected. If only one or no variant is detected by the sequencing method used, the next step is to perform gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis to detect exon and whole-gene deletions or duplications.

A multigene panel that includes FBP1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other metabolic disorders, comprehensive genomic testing does not require the clinician to determine which gene is likely involved. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Molecular Genetic Testing

Gene 1MethodProportion of Pathogenic Variants 2 Identified by Method
FBP1 Sequence analysis 3~90% 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5~10% 6
1.
2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.
5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Exome and genome sequencing may be able to detect deletions/duplications using breakpoint detection or read depth; however, sensitivity can be lower than gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

6.

Herzog et al [2001], Åsberg et al [2010], Lebigot et al [2015], Santer et al [2016], Bhai et al [2018], and data derived from the subscription-based professional view of Human Gene Mutation Database [Stenson et al 2020]

Analysis of FBP1 Activity

While enzymatic activity in leukocytes and liver is very specific, testing is not widely available [Besley et al 1994, Lebigot et al 2015]: spectrophotometric analysis to estimate enzyme activity in leukocytes is performed in a few laboratories worldwide. The usual assay measures the amount of NADPH formed – a nonspecific assay, as NADPH may be formed from other reactions within the cells. Specificity can be achieved by testing for FBP1 activity in the presence and absence of AMP, a specific inhibitor for the enzyme [Lebigot et al 2015]. FBP1 stability in untreated blood samples at +4 °C lasts 24 hours, and therefore samples can be transported long distances to a reference laboratory.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

The manifestations of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency are generally episodic, occurring due to lactic acidosis and ketotic hypoglycemia, which are often triggered by fasting or febrile infections. The episodes of acute crisis are most frequent in early life – neonatal period, infancy, and early childhood – and subsequently decrease in frequency. In FBP1 deficiency, several metabolic derangements can occur with or without hypoglycemia.

Onset. Classically, FBP1 deficiency manifests in the first year of life. Nearly half of affected infants present within the first four days of life with an acute crisis. Neonatal presentation results from hypoglycemia due to deficient glycogen stores [Steinmann & Santer 2016].

Acute crises are characterized by episodes of respiratory distress or hyperventilation, apneic spells, seizures, and/or lethargy/coma, often with hepatomegaly. Muscular hypotonia may also be present. This may be associated with transient liver dysfunction (transaminitis), which does not require specific treatment [Bhai et al 2018]. Elevation of creatine kinase has been noted in at least one individual in acute crisis [Bhai et al 2018]. This may indicate rhabdomyolysis secondary to energy deficiency.

Acute crises are more frequent in early life – neonatal period, infancy, and early childhood. With age, the frequency of attacks decreases, and episodes are characterized by irritability, somnolence, hypotonia, tachycardia, dyspnea, and hyperhidrosis. Reports of adults presenting in acute crisis are scarce [Moon et al 2011, Fawdry et al 2022].

Factors known to trigger episodes include fever, fasting, decreased oral intake, vomiting, infections, and ingestion of large amounts of fructose. Episodes tend to be recurrent. Often four to five episodes occur before the correct diagnosis is established [Lebigot et al 2015].

Growth and development. In between crises, children are asymptomatic and the majority experience normal growth and psychomotor development [Steinmann & Santer 2016]. A few children with brain injury and/or intellectual disability have been reported, probably related to early and prolonged hypoglycemia [Li et al 2017, Moey et al 2018].

In those who receive treatment, obesity may develop, which is suspected to be due to overtreatment with carbohydrate-based diet.

Prognosis in untreated individuals. Symptoms worsen progressively as continued catabolism leads to multiorgan failure (especially liver, brain, and later heart). Morbidity and mortality are high. Sepsis, blindness, and Reye syndrome-like presentation have been reported [Lebigot et al 2015, Bhai et al 2018].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No clinically relevant genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified.

Nomenclature

Baker & Winegrad [1970] first described deficiency of hepatic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (hence the eponymous Baker-Winegrad disease) in a child with hypoglycemia and metabolic acidosis on fasting.

Prevalence

FBP1 deficiency is rare. Approximately 190 affected individuals have been reported to date.

Estimated prevalence of FBP1 deficiency is 1:350,000 in the Dutch population [Visser et al 2004] and <1:900,000 in the French population [Lebigot et al 2015]. The disorder may be more frequent in populations with higher rates of consanguinity [Santer et al 2016].

Differential Diagnosis

Table 2a provides a comparative analysis of genetic disorders with clinical similarities to fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency. Table 2b compares the biochemical parameters of these disorders.

Table 2a.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Genetic Differential Diagnosis

Gene(s)DisorderMOIFeatures to Similar to FBP1 DeficiencyFeatures Distinct from FBP1 Deficiency
ACADM
ACADVL
CPT1A
HADHA
HADHB
Fatty acid oxidation defects (FAODs) incl:
MCAD deficiency
VLCAD deficiency
CPT1A deficiency
LCHAD deficiency
ARCan present in neonates w/hypoglycemia
  • Usually presents w/hypoketotic hypoglycemia & hyperammonemia.
  • Other features incl myopathy & cardiomyopathy.
  • Elevated acylcarnitine in MS/MS
ACAT1 Beta-ketothiolase deficiency
(BKT) (OMIM 203750)
ARKetotic hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia & metabolic acidosis
  • Elevation of specific metabolites on urine organic acids by GCMS can incl 2-methylacetocetate, 2-methyl-3-hydroxybutyryl CoA, & tiglylglycine.
  • Lactate is usually not elevated.
ALDOB Hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI)AR
  • When weaned onto sucrose- or fructose-containing foods, infants can manifest nausea, bloating, vomiting, sweating, abdominal pain, & growth restriction.
  • Chronic liver & kidney disease occur in untreated children.
  • More chronic course overall
  • Affected children have strong aversion to sweets.
  • Renal tubular dysfunction
  • GI manifestations & growth restriction w/chronic fructose ingestion
G6PC1
SLC37A4
Glycogen storage disease type I (GSD I)AR
  • Accumulation of glycogen & fat in liver & kidneys resulting in hepatomegaly & nephromegaly
  • Untreated infants present at age 3-4 mos w/hepatomegaly, severe hypoglycemia ± seizures, lactic acidosis, hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, & hypertriglyceridemia.
Not assoc w/detection of glycerol on urine organic acid analysis
PC Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency (PCD)AR
  • Episodes of acute vomiting, tachypnea, & acidosis are usually precipitated by metabolic stress or infection.
  • Episodes may be very similar to FBP1 deficiency (w/elevated lactate-to-pyruvate ratio, hyperalaninemia, hypoglycemia, & metabolic acidosis).
Neurologic involvement, severe ID, & recurrent seizures in PCD types A & B.
PGM1 PGM1-CDG (OMIM 614921)ARPresents more commonly w/rhabdomyolysis; however, episodic hypoglycemia & metabolic acidosis may also occur. 1
  • Short stature, birth defects (incl cleft palate, bifid uvula), & dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Abnormal transferrin isoforms
>340 genes 2 Primary mitochondrial disorders AD
AR
MT
XL
  • Multisystem involvement in which most metabolically active organs are most affected (e.g., brain, liver, kidney, heart)
  • Variable presentation incl neonatal metabolic acidosis w/increased lactate
Usual disease course is gradually progressive loss of developmental milestones (more rapid decline occurs w/episodic crises).
ABCC8
GCK
GLUD1
HADH
HK1
HNF1A
HNF4A
INSR
KCNJ11
PMM2
SLC16A1
UCP2
Nonsyndromic genetic hyperinsulinism See footnote 3.Neonatal hypoglycemiaInappropriate hypoketonemia

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; CDG = congenital disorder of glycosylation; CPT1A = carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A; GCMS = gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; GI = gastrointestinal; ID = intellectual disability; LCHAD = long-chain hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase; MCAD = medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; MOI = mode of inheritance; MS/MS = tandem mass spectrometry; MT = mitochondrial; VLCAD = very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase

1.
2.
3.

Mode of inheritance depends on the underlying genetic mechanism (see Nonsyndromic Genetic Hyperinsulinism Overview).

Table 2b.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Biochemical Parameters of Differential Diagnosis Disorders

Biochemical ParameterFBP1 Deficiency
(topic of this GeneReview)
FAODBKT HFI GSD I PCD Primary mitochondrial disorders
Hyperlactatemia FastingFastingUsually absentFastingPermanent, also increased w/fastingPermanentPermanent
Lactate-to-pyruvate ratio 20-40NNNN>30>20
Ketosis N/↑↑N↑↑N/↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Triglycerides Pseudo-hyperNNNN
Glucose LN/LLLN/LL/N/HL
Ammonia NNN↑↑N/↑↑
Alanine ↑↑NN↑↑N↑↑↑↑
Citrulline NNNNNHN
Liver dysfunction (transaminitis) N/↑NN/↑
Uric acid NNNNN
Organic acids in urine Ketonuria, glycerol, glycerol-3-phosphate↑ C16-C222-methylacetocetate, 2-methyl-3-hydroxybutyryl CoA, tiglylglycineKetonuriaKetonuriaLactate/ketonuriaLactate, Kreb cycle intermediates

↑ = increased; ↑↑ = moderately increased; ↑↑↑ = severely increased; BKT = beta-ketothiolase deficiency; CoA = coenzyme A; FAOD = fatty acid oxidation defect; FBP1 = fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1; GSD I = glycogen storage disease type I; H = high; HFI = hereditary fructose intolerance; L = low; N = normal; PCD = pyruvate carboxylase deficiency

Management

No clinical practice guidelines for fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency have been published. In the absence of published guidelines, the following recommendations are based on the authors' personal experience managing individuals with this disorder.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in a child diagnosed with FBP1 deficiency, the evaluations summarized in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended [Wang et al 2017, Bhai et al 2018].

Table 3.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Recommended Evaluations at Initial Diagnosis

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
Biochemical Consultation w/metabolic physician / biochemical geneticist & specialist metabolic dietician
  • Transfer to specialist center w/experience in mgmt of inherited metabolic diseases (strongly recommended).
  • Consider short hospitalization at center of expertise for inherited metabolic conditions to provide caregivers w/detailed education (natural history, maintenance & emergency treatment, prognosis, & risks for acute crises).
Measure blood glucose, arterial blood gas, serum lactate, ketones, urine organic acids, liver function tests, lipid profile, uric acid, & creatine kinase. 1
Respiratory Assess respiratory status (apnea, dyspnea).
Neurologic Neurologic eval
  • Consider EEG if seizures are a concern.
  • Brain MRI may be considered in those w/encephalopathy & seizures.
Infection Assess for possible infection in those presenting in crisis.
Liver function
  • Abdominal ultrasound to assess for hepatomegaly
  • Liver function tests
  • Serum lipid panel
  • Serum uric acid
Growth/
Nutrition
  • Assess growth parameters (height, weight, head circumference).
  • Assess diet & nutritional status.
Development Developmental assessmentRefer to developmental pediatrician to assess motor, adaptive, cognitive, & speech-language skills & need for early intervention / special education.
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 1To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of FBP1 deficiency to facilitate medical & personal decision making
Family support
& resources
By clinicians, wider care team, & family support organizationsAssessment of family & social structure to determine need for:

FBP1 = fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1; MOI = mode of inheritance

1.

Elevation of creatine kinase has been noted in at least one individual in acute crisis [Bhai et al 2018]. This may indicate rhabdomyolysis secondary to energy deficiency.

Treatment of Manifestations

There is no cure for FBP1 deficiency. However, treatment during acute crises and routine dietary management can ameliorate and/or prevent long-term manifestations of this disorder. An international survey of 126 affected individuals from 36 centers revealed widely varying practices of fructose/sucrose restriction; the authors concluded that internationally accepted guidelines for management and surveillance were needed [Pinto et al 2018].

Emergency Outpatient Treatment of Acute Crisis

The threshold for emergency outpatient evaluation and treatment should be low. Acute management guidelines are available from the British Inherited Metabolic Disease Group (see protocol [pdf]).

Table 5.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Emergency Outpatient Treatment

Manifestation/
Concern
TreatmentConsiderations
Mildly increased catabolism 1
  • Increase frequency of carbohydrate feedings.
  • Intake of glucose polymers
  • Restriction of fructose, sucrose, glycerol, & sorbitol
  • Trial of outpatient treatment at home requires good communication between family & providers.
  • Frequent reassessment of affected person
  • Intervention (oral glucose or IV dextrose) should take place early in an acute crisis while blood glucose is normal due to possibility of delayed hypoglycemia, which only occurs relatively late in the course of acute metabolic decompensation.
Measure the following:
  • Blood gas
  • Serum glucose (laboratory & bedside strip test)
  • BUN & electrolytes
  • Lactate
  • CBC & blood culture
  • Urine ketones
Ketonuria is an early indicator of impending crisis.
Fever Administer antipyretics that do not contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, &/or sorbitol.

BUN = blood urea nitrogen; CBC = complete blood count; IV = intravenous

1.

Fever, cough, or cold; loose stools; continues to eat; not associated with lethargy

Acute Inpatient Treatment

The child should receive emergency treatment if the child is vomiting, complaining of stomach pain, or not wanting to eat or drink, irrespective of associated symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, cold).

Acute manifestations of hypoglycemia (lethargy, encephalopathy, seizures, hyperhidrosis), often occurring in the setting of intercurrent illness and/or inadequate caloric intake, should be managed symptomatically and with generous caloric support in a hospital setting, with aggressive treatment and supportive care of any identified or clinically suspected acute conditions.

Table 6.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Acute Inpatient Treatment

Manifestation/
Concern
TreatmentConsiderations
Hypoglycemia
  • IV glucose bolus (2 mL/kg of 10% dextrose) followed by continuous infusion of glucose at high rates (10% dextrose infusion)
  • Transition to oral/enteral feeds as clinically tolerated
  • Treat w/glucose early in acute crisis while blood glucose is still normal due to possibility of delayed hypoglycemia, which only occurs relatively late in the course of acute metabolic decompensation.
  • The symptoms of acute illness typically subside soon after administration of IV dextrose & child should recover quickly (w/in hrs), usually w/no residual damage.
Metabolic acidosis
  • IV glucose bolus as above
  • If pH remains <7.1 or worsens, administer NaHCO3 as half calculated dose over 30-min period.
  • Restrict fructose, glycerol, sucrose, & sorbitol.
  • Acidosis usually corrects quickly w/o NaHCO3 infusion.
  • No consensus exists re restriction of dietary fructose & sucrose.
Hepatomegaly & elevated transaminases NoneTransient findings that resolve spontaneously

IV = intravenous; NaHCO3 = sodium bicarbonate

Outpatient Routine Treatment of Manifestations

Table 4.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Outpatient Routine Treatment of Manifestations

ManifestationTreatmentConsideration/Other
Avoidance of hypoglycemia
  • In infants, frequent feeding (every 2-3 hrs)
  • Avoid fasting & consume frequent meals to prevent hypoglycemia.
  • At bedtime, 1-2 g/kg of uncooked cornstarch mixed in milk or water for children age ≥6-12 mos who have nocturnal hypoglycemia 1
  • IV glucose is recommended for surgical procedures that require several hrs of fasting.
  • Written protocols for maintenance & emergency treatment should be provided to parents, primary care providers / pediatricians, teachers, & school staff. 2
  • Emergency letter should summarize key info & principles of emergency treatment & provide contact info for primary treating metabolic center.
  • For any planned travel or vacations, consider contacting center of expertise near destination prior to travel dates.
  • Prolonged or intense exercise should be covered by adequate carbohydrate intake & hydration.
Preventing triggers causing acute crisis Restriction of food items or medicines that contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, &/or sorbitolUnlike HFI, persons w/FBP1 deficiency tolerate small amounts of fructose; however, fructose should be avoided in times of acute sickness.
  • Routine immunizations, incl annual influenza vaccine, to reduce risk of infections that can precipitate hypoglycemia
  • Mgmt of acute intercurrent illnesses, which can exacerbate need for glucose.
There is no immunodeficiency, & therefore all types of vaccines are permitted. However, after vaccination provide frequent feeds/meals rich in carbohydrates to prevent catabolic state.
Planning for surgery or procedure
(incl dental procedures)
  • Notify designated metabolic center in advance of procedure to discuss perioperative mgmt w/surgeons & anesthesiologists. 3
  • Emergency surgeries/procedures require input from physicians w/expertise in inherited metabolic diseases (w/respect to perioperative fluid & nutritional mgmt).
Consider placing flag in affected person's medical record such that all care providers are aware of diagnosis & need to solicit guidance from designated metabolic specialists in the setting of certain procedures.
Care coordination
  • Encourage medical alert bracelet.
  • Provide letter & written protocols for mgmt of intercurrent illnesses or other catabolic stressors.
  • Provide families w/letter to optimize social & school services.
Invaluable for coordinating treatment at centers w/o expertise in biochemical disorders
Developmental delay / Intellectual disability See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.May occur in those w/prolonged hypoglycemia
Transition to adult care As a lifelong disorder w/varying implications according to age, a smooth transition of care from pediatric setting to adult setting for long-term mgmt is ideal.

FBP1 = fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1; HFI = hereditary fructose intolerance; IV = intravenous

1.
2.

Essential information including written treatment protocols should be provided before inpatient emergency treatment might be necessary.

3.

Perioperative/perianesthetic management precautions may include evaluation at a specialist anesthetic clinic for affected individuals deemed to be high risk for perioperative complications.

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • IEP services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • Special education law requires that children participating in an IEP be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible, when and where appropriate.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Speech, language, and communication issues. Speech-language evaluation should be considered early in development for children who have delayed communication milestones or who are not yet talking. Evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication [AAC]) is appropriate for individuals who have speech or receptive and expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation should be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. This evaluation typically takes into account cognitive abilities, sensory impairments, and motor skills to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, but rather support optimal speech and language development. Many children will continue to require AAC into later childhood and adulthood, while some may use their AAC for a shorter time to help aid speech and language development.

Surveillance

No formal guidelines for long-term surveillance for individuals with FBP1 deficiency exist. Table 7 summarizes long-term surveillance based on the natural history of the disorder.

Table 7.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency/Comment
Growth/
Nutrition
Assess height, weight, & head circumference.At each visit throughout childhood & adolescence
Development Assess developmental milestones.At each visit
Neuropsychological testing using age-appropriate standardized assessment batteriesAs needed
Psychosocial /
Family Support
Standardized quality-of-life assessment tools for affected persons & parents/caregivers

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Avoid ingestion of food items or medicines that contain fructose, sucrose, glycerol, and/or sorbitol, especially during acute crises in infancy or early childhood.

Although small amounts of fructose (≤2 g/kg/day) are well tolerated by individuals with FBP1 deficiency, single ingestion of high doses of fructose (>1g/kg) is harmful, especially in younger children.

Fructose tolerance testing (fructose challenge) to diagnose FBP1 deficiency can be hazardous and should not be performed.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk sibs of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from prompt initiation of measures to prevent acute crises (frequent feedings and avoidance of fasting) and prompt treatment of infections / febrile illnesses.

For newborns who may be at risk for FBP1 deficiency, it is important to avoid fasting, to feed regularly, and to monitor for hypoglycemia and acidosis while awaiting results of biochemical and/or molecular genetic testing. Monitoring for hypoglycemia can include use of bedside glucometers and clinical monitoring for lethargy, poor intake, vomiting, hypothermia, and/or tachypnea. A low threshold for starting an intravenous infusion of 5%-10% dextrose may prevent an acute crisis, especially in newborns who have low birth weight, are preterm, or have a diabetic mother.

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

Although successful pregnancies have been reported in women with FBP1 deficiency [Åsberg et al 2010], certain precautions should be taken:

  • Pre-pregnancy
    • Counseling that emphasizes the importance of frequent eating in preventing hypoglycemia and the use of blood glucose monitoring for early detection of hypoglycemia
    • Consider referral to a high-risk obstetric center and consultation with a metabolic physician.
  • During pregnancy
    • Frequent home glucose monitoring for early detection of hypoglycemia
    • Maintenance of glycemic control by taking uncooked cornstarch at night as needed [Krishnamurthy et al 2007, Sugita et al 2014]
    • In the third trimester when the physiologic requirements of energy are highest, increase in dietary intake and glucose monitoring as needed
  • During labor. Continuous glucose infusion to maintain euglycemia

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) deficiency is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Parents of a proband

Sibs of a proband

  • If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an FBP1 pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of inheriting biallelic pathogenic variants and being affected, a 50% chance of inheriting a heterozygous pathogenic variant and being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of inheriting neither of the familial pathogenic variants and being unaffected and not a carrier.
  • Heterozygotes (carriers) are asymptomatic and are not at risk of developing the disorder.

Offspring of a proband. Unless an affected individual's reproductive partner also has FBP1 deficiency or is a carrier, offspring will be obligate heterozygotes (carriers) for an FBP1 pathogenic variant.

Other family members. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being a carrier of an FBP1 pathogenic variant.

Carrier Detection

Molecular genetic carrier testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the FBP1 pathogenic variants in the family.

Biochemical enzyme-based testing is not reliable for carrier detection.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk sibs for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected, are carriers, or are at risk of being carriers.
  • It is appropriate to offer FBP1 molecular genetic testing for reproductive partners of individuals known to have FBP1 deficiency or to be heterozygous for an FBP1 pathogenic variant.

DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown). For more information, see Huang et al [2022].

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Molecular genetic testing. Once the FBP1 pathogenic variants have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Note: Biochemical testing is not a reliable method for prenatal diagnosis, as FBP1 enzyme activity has been reported to be low in human placenta [Papamarcaki & Tsolas 1991].

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency: Genes and Databases

GeneChromosome LocusProteinLocus-Specific DatabasesHGMDClinVar
FBP19q22​.32Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1FBP1 databaseFBP1FBP1

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase 1 Deficiency (View All in OMIM)

229700FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE DEFICIENCY; FBP1D
611570FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE 1; FBP1

Molecular Pathogenesis

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 (FBP1) is a key enzyme of the gluconeogenic pathway. Its deficiency impairs glucose production from all gluconeogenic precursors, including dietary fructose. As a result, euglycemia in persons with FBP1 deficiency depends on glycogen stores in the liver. During glycemic stress (including catabolic states such as infections and fasting), glycogen stores are depleted and the gluconeogenic substrates pyruvate, alanine, and glycerol accumulate (see Figure 1). The subsequent conversion of pyruvate into lactate and acetyl-coenzyme A results in lactic acidemia and ketosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Pathophysiology of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 deficiency Aldo A = aldolase A; DHAP = dihydroxyacetone phosphate; FBPase = fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; G3P = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; GAH = glyceraldehyde; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; PC = pyruvate (more...)

Deficient conversion of glucose-1-phosphate to glucose also activates the pentose phosphate pathway, causing both the production of ribose-5-phosphate and the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines. The subsequent breakdown of purines and pyrimidines results in hyperuricemia.

Mechanism of disease causation. Loss of function

FBP1-specific laboratory technical considerations. FBP1 comprises one noncoding exon (exon 1) and seven coding exons.

Chapter Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge our senior colleagues, Dr Ishwar Chander Verma, Dr Ratna D Puri, and Dr Renu Saxena, for rendering support in writing this article. Significant contributions from other colleagues, Dr Pratibha Bhai, Dr Deepti Gupta, Dr Ranjana Mishra, Dr Vibha Jain, and Dr Jyotsna Verma, are also gratefully acknowledged.

Revision History

  • 7 July 2026 (sw) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 5 December 2019 (bp) Review posted live
  • 20 May 2019 (sbm) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Afroze B, Yunus Z, Steinmann B, Santer R. Transient pseudo-hypertriglyceridemia: a useful biochemical marker of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:1249-53. [PubMed: 23881342]
  • Åsberg C, Hjalmarson O, Alm J, Martinsson T, Waldenström J, Hellerud C. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: enzyme and mutation analysis performed on calcitriol-stimulated monocytes with a note on long-term prognosis. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33:S113-21. [PubMed: 20151204]
  • Baker L, Winegrad AI. Fasting hypoglycaemia and metabolic acidosis associated with deficiency of hepatic fructose-1,6-diphosphatase activity. Lancet. 1970;2:13-6. [PubMed: 4193749]
  • Besley GT, Walter JH, Lewis MA, Chard CR, Addison GM. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: severe phenotype with normal leukocyte enzyme activity. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1994;17:333-5. [PubMed: 7807945]
  • Bhai P, Bijarnia-Mahay S, Puri RD, Saxena R, Gupta D, Kotecha U, Sachdev A, Gupta D, Vyas V, Agarwal D, Jain V, Bansal RK, Kumar TG, Verma IC. Clinical and molecular characterization of Indian patients with fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase deficiency: identification of a frequent variant (E281K). Ann Hum Genet. 2018;82:309-17. [PubMed: 29774539]
  • Cole TG. Glycerol blanking in triglyceride assays: is it necessary? Clin Chem.1990;36:1267-8. [PubMed: 2136327]
  • Conte F, Morava E, Bakar NA, Wortmann SB, Poerink AJ, Grunewald S, Crushell E, Al-Gazali L, de Vries MC, Mørkrid L, Hertecant J, Brocke Holmefjord KS, Kronn D, Feigenbaum A, Fingerhut R, Wong SY, van Scherpenzeel M, Voermans NC, Lefeber DJ. Phosphoglucomutase-1 deficiency: Early presentation, metabolic management and detection in neonatal blood spots. Mol Genet Metab. 2020;131:135-46. [PubMed: 33342467]
  • Fawdry H, Gorrigan R, Ramachandran R, Drake WM. A novel variant of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene identified in an adult with newly diagnosed hepatitis C. JIMD Rep. 2022;63:109-13. [PMC free article: PMC8898736] [PubMed: 35281660]
  • Gusic M, Prokisch H. Genetic basis of mitochondrial diseases. FEBS Lett. 2021;595:1132-58. [PubMed: 33655490]
  • Herzog B, Morris AA, Saunders C, Eschrich K. Mutation spectrum in patients with fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2001;24:87-8. [PubMed: 11286391]
  • Huang SJ, Amendola LM, Sternen DL. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on. J Community Genet. 2022;13:389-97. [PMC free article: PMC9314484] [PubMed: 35834113]
  • Ijaz S, Zahoor MY, Imran M, Ramzan K, Bhinder MA, Shakeel H, Iqbal M, Aslam A, Shehzad W, Cheema HA, Rehman H. Genetic analysis of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) deficiency in nine consanguineous Pakistani families. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;30:1203-10. [PubMed: 29016355]
  • Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, Hardarson MT, Hjorleifsson KE, Eggertsson HP, Gudjonsson SA, Ward LD, Arnadottir GA, Helgason EA, Helgason H, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Rafnar T, Frigge M, Stacey SN, Th Magnusson O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Masson G, Kong A, Halldorsson BV, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519-22. [PubMed: 28959963]
  • Kikawa Y, Inuzuka M, Jin BY, Kaji S, Koga J, Yamamoto Y, Fujisawa K, Hata I, Nakai A, Shigematsu Y, Mizunuma H, Taketo A, Mayumi M, Sudo M. Identification of genetic mutations in Japanese patients with fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:852-61. [PMC free article: PMC1715983] [PubMed: 9382095]
  • Krishnamurthy V, Eschrich K, Boney A, Sullivan J, McDonald M, Kishnani PS, Koeberl DD. Three successful pregnancies through dietary management of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007;30:819. [PubMed: 17705024]
  • Lebigot E, Brassier A, Zater M, Imanci D, Feillet F, Thérond P, de Lonlay P, Boutron A. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: clinical, biochemical and genetic features in French patients. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015;38:881-7. [PubMed: 25601412]
  • Li N, Chang G, Xu Y, Ding Y, Li G, Yu T, Qing Y, Li J, Shen Y, Wang J, Wang X. Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:E857. [PMC free article: PMC5412439] [PubMed: 28420223]
  • Moey LH, Abdul Azize NA, Yakob Y, Leong HY, Keng WT, Chen BC, Ngu LH. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency as a cause of recurrent hypoglycemia and metabolic acidosis: clinical and molecular findings in Malaysian patients. Pediatr Neonatol. 2018;59:397-403. [PubMed: 29203193]
  • Moon S, Kim JH, Han JH, Ko SH, Ahn YB, Kim JH, Yang SH, Song KH. Novel compound heterozygous mutations in the fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase gene cause hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis. Metabolism. 2011;60:107-13. [PubMed: 20096900]
  • Papamarcaki T, Tsolas O. Demonstration of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase in human term placenta. Experientia. 1991;47:67-8. [PubMed: 1847882]
  • Pinheiro FC, Sperb-Ludwig F, Ligabue-Braun R, Schüler-Faccini L, de Souza CFM, Vairo F, Schwartz IVD. Genetic analysis of patients with fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency. Gene. 2019;699:102-9. [PubMed: 30858132]
  • Pinto A, Alfadhel M, Akroyd R, Atik Altınok Y, Bernabei SM, Bernstein L, Bruni G, Caine G, Cameron E, Carruthers R, Cochrane B, Daly A, de Boer F, Delaunay S,Dianin A, Dixon M, Drogari E, Dubois S, Evans S, Gribben J, Gugelmo G, Heidenborg C, Hunjan I, Kok IL, Kumru B, Liguori A, Mayr D, Megdad E, Meyer U, Oliveira RB, Pal A, Pozzoli A, Pretese R, Rocha JC, Rosenbaum-Fabian S, Serrano-Nieto J,Sjoqvist E, Timmer C, White L, van den Hurk T, van Rijn M, Zweers H, Ziadlou M, MacDonald A. International practices in the dietary management of fructose 1-6 biphosphatase deficiency. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13:21. [PMC free article: PMC5785792] [PubMed: 29370874]
  • Prahl P, Christensen E, Hansen L, Mortensen HB. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency as a cause of recessive serious hypoglycaemia. Ugeskr Laeger. 2006;168:4014-5. [PubMed: 17125659]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Santer R, du Moulin M, Shahinyan T, Vater I, Maier E, Muntau AC, Steinmann B. A summary of molecular genetic findings in fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency with a focus on a common long-range deletion and the role of MLPA analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:44. [PMC free article: PMC4839065] [PubMed: 27101822]
  • Steinmann B, Santer R. Disorders of fructose metabolism. In: Saudubray JM, ed. Inborn Metabolic Diseases. 6 ed. Springer-Verlag; 2016:165–7.
  • Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Chapman M, Evans K, Azevedo L, Hayden M, Heywood S, Millar DS, Phillips AD, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®): optimizing its use in a clinical diagnostic or research setting. Hum Genet. 2020;139:1197-207. [PMC free article: PMC7497289] [PubMed: 32596782]
  • Sugita G, Tsuyoshi H, Nishijima K, Yoshida Y. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: a case of a successful pregnancy by closely monitoring metabolic control. JIMD Rep. 2014;14:115-8. [PMC free article: PMC4213334] [PubMed: 24470127]
  • Takagi D, Ben-Ari J, Nemet D, Zeharia A, Eliakim A. Recurrent infantile hypoglycemia due to combined fructose-1,6-diphosphatase deficiency and growth hormone deficiency. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2013;26:761-3. [PubMed: 23585210]
  • Visser G, Bakker HD, de Klerk JBC, Smeitink JAM, Smit GPA, Wijburg FA. Natural history and treatment of fructose-1,6,-bisphosphatase deficiency in the Netherlands (abstract). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2004;27:207.
  • Wang S, Sun J, Kong X, Yang C, Feng Z. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase deficiency: clinical manifestations and genetic features in two Chinese patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10:7273-8.
Copyright © 1993-2026, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved. Test.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (https://www.genereviews.org) and copyright (© 1993-2026 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: addmast@wu.edu

Bookshelf ID: NBK550349PMID: 31804789

Views

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...