RCT stratified on HER2 status/HER2-guided vs. non-HER2-guided | |
|
RCT prespecified MV SGA
| |
RCT post-hoc MV SGA
| Von Minckwitz 2007 | 194 | Neoadjuvant tumor≥3cm, age 18–70 | doxorubicin+ docetaxel + tamoxifen (TAM) | pCR | Univariate: Not reported; |
| | | | | Log reg: IHC HER2 as predictor of pCR p=0.126; HER2*TAM not reported
|
Rasmussen 2008 | 3533 | Adjuvant postmen HR+ | tamoxifen vs. letrozole | DFS | Univariate : FISH/IHC HER2+ vs. HER2- p<.0001 |
| | | | | Coxa: FISH/IHC HER2*Tx, p=.60 |
| | | | TTR | Cox: FISH/IHC HER2*Tx NS |
Dowsett 2008 | 1782 | Adjuvant postmen HR+ | tamoxifen vs. anastrozole (ANA) for 5 yrs | TETR | Univariate: FISH/IHC HER2 - vs. + ANA:p<0.0001, TAM:p=.002 |
| | | | | Cox: FISH/IHC HER2 - vs. + ANA:p<0.001, TAM:p=.014 |
| | | | | “no indication” of greater differential benefit of ANA vs. TAM but |
| | | | | no statistics provided and only 44 HER2+ pts so CIs wide |
Ryden 2005, 2007 | 470 | Adjuvant, Stage II, Premen or <50 years | tamoxifen vs. observation | RFS | Univariate: IHC HER2- Tx vs. Cx p=.07 (ER+) |
| | | | | IHC HER2+ Tx vs. Cx p=.2 (ER+) |
| | | | | FISH HER2- or HER2+ Tx vs. Cx p=.14 (ER+) |
| | | | | Cox regression: IHC HER2*TAM p=.4 (ER+); p=.3 (ER+/PR+) |
| | | | | FISH/IHC HER2*TAM p=.95 (unclear if ER+ only) |
Knoop 2001 | 1515 | Adjuvant, High risk, Postmen | tamoxifen vs. observation | DFS | Univariate: IHC HER2 lo+ or - Tx vs. Cx p=.0001 (HR+) |
| | | | | IHC HER2 hi+ Tx vs. Cx p=.5 (HR+) |
| | | | | Cox regression: IHC HER2 and HER2*TAM not significant (HR+) |
|
RCT treatment by HER2 SGA | |
|
1-arm prespecified MV analysis
| |
1-arm post-hoc MV analysis
| Arpino 2004 | 136 | Metastatic, 1st line Tx | tamoxifen | ORR | No stat signif diff FISH HER2 + vs. - in CR+PR+SD |
| | | | TTF | univariate: FISH HER2 - vs. + p=.007 |
| | | | | Cox regression: HER2+ as predictor TTF p=.54 |
| | | | OS | univariate: FISH HER2 - vs. + p=.07 |
|
1-arm UV analysis | | | | | | Cox regression: HER2+ as predictor OS p=.97 |