U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Display Settings:

Items per page

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 133

1.
Fig 2

Fig 2. Relationship between precipitation and throughfall amount of patches of zoysiagrass and creeping bentgrass for all 15 natural storms.. From: Measuring turfgrass canopy interception and throughfall using co-located pluviometers.

The x-intercept of 4.4 mm (95% CI [3.6, 5.3]) represents the minimum canopy interception before throughfall begins. The linear fitting exercise was done only using storm events that had throughfall >0 mm. Error bars represent the standard deviation of throughfall and precipitation. For some markers error bars are masked by the marker size.

Don Wesley Dyer, et al. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0271236.
2.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Factors controlling throughfall in a Pinus tabulaeformis forest in North China.

Relationship between rainfall, throughfall and throughfall rate.

Xi Wei, et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14060.
3.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China.

Cation (a) and anion (b) flux in throughfall plus stemflow and litter leachate. TF: throughfall; SF: stemflow; LL: litter leachate.

Zhan Chen, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar;19(5):2810.
4.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China.

Water sample collectors: (a) throughfall, (b) stemflow, (c) litter leachate.

Zhan Chen, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar;19(5):2810.
5.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: Factors controlling throughfall in a Pinus tabulaeformis forest in North China.

Fitting effect analysis of stepwise regression equation of the throughfall rate.

Xi Wei, et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14060.
6.
Figure 5

Figure 5. From: Factors controlling throughfall in a Pinus tabulaeformis forest in North China.

Analysis of the fitting effect of the quadratic response surface model for throughfall rate.

Xi Wei, et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14060.
8.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Microbial nitrification in throughfall of a Japanese cedar associated with archaea from the tree canopy.

Experimental flow of throughfall collection, filtration treatment prior to incubation, and sample collection for the detection of amoA genes from filters and leaves

Keiji Watanabe, et al. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1596.
9.

Figure 4. From: Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China.

Cation (a) and anion (b) concentrations in throughfall, stemflow, and litter leachate among different forest types during different sampling months.

Zhan Chen, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar;19(5):2810.
11.
Fig 3

Fig 3. From: Measuring turfgrass canopy interception and throughfall using co-located pluviometers.

Comparison of cumulative precipitation, cumulative throughfall, and canopy interception for patches of zoysiagrass and creeping bentgrass during a storm with a single rainfall event (A and B, storm 14 in ) and a storm with three rainfall events of variable lengths (C and D, storm 10 in ). Both storms resulted in similar precipitation amount but had a different number of intra-storm precipitation events. The point of throughfall denoted by arrows.

Don Wesley Dyer, et al. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0271236.
12.
Figure 4

Figure 4. From: The role of stable isotopes in understanding rainfall interception processes: A review.

Greatest individual-event ranges of δ18O for each study: (A) between plot means in throughfall, (B) between throughfall and stemflow, and (C) among individual throughfall collectors; open bars indicate mean spatial range across all events is also included (open bars).

Scott T. Allen*, et al. WIREs Water. ;4(1):1-17.
13.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Experimental throughfall reduction barely affects soil carbon dynamics in a warm-temperate oak forest, central China.

Seasonal course of soil temperature (a,b), soil moisture (c,d), total soil respiration (SR; e), heterotrophic soil respiration (HR; f) and autotrophic soil respiration (AR; g) at trenched (b,d,f) and un-trenched (a,c,e,g) sub-plots. Symbols show mean values ± SE (n = 3). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between control and throughfall reduction (TFR) plots (P < 0.05). The shaded areas show the periods when the throughfall was excluded.

Haibo Lu, et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15099.
14.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Experimental throughfall reduction barely affects soil carbon dynamics in a warm-temperate oak forest, central China.

Seasonal variation of daily (black bars) and monthly (grey bars) precipitation under ambient environment. The black arrow shows the natural drought period from September to December in 2013. The areas between two dash lines show the periods when the throughfall was excluded.

Haibo Lu, et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15099.
15.
Fig 1

Fig 1. Throughfall kinetic energy (TKE, log-transformed) of the 11 species analyzed.. From: Species-Specific Effects on Throughfall Kinetic Energy in Subtropical Forest Plantations Are Related to Leaf Traits and Tree Architecture.

Dotted line represents the total mean TKE. Inside the boxplots white rectangles represent mean and white bars standard deviation. For abbreviations of species names see .

Philipp Goebes, et al. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128084.
16.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Microbial nitrification in throughfall of a Japanese cedar associated with archaea from the tree canopy.

Changes in ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate concentrations in the incubated throughfall samples of Cj1 and Cj2 and rainfall samples (RF), which were passed through several filters with different pore sizes before incubation. Ammonium concentrations in samples incubated for 2 and 3 weeks were not determined

Keiji Watanabe, et al. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1596.
17.

Figure 3. From: Effects of Forest Type on Nutrient Fluxes in Throughfall, Stemflow, and Litter Leachate within Acid-Polluted Locations in Southwest China.

pH, electrical conductivity (a), dissolved organic carbon, and ratio of ∑+ to ∑ (RCA) (b) of throughfall, stemflow, and litter leachate in different forest types during the sampling months. Capital letters indicate significant differences between sampling times for waterflows of each forest type. Lowercase letters indicate significant effects of forest type at the same sampling time. Asterisks indicate significant differences between precipitation and stemflow, throughfall, and litter leachate at the same sampling time. *, ** and *** respectively indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001.

Zhan Chen, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar;19(5):2810.
18.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Inexpensive throughfall exclusion experiment for single large trees.

Canopy and base of tree installment stages of the drought experiment. Canopy access for installation of water relations instruments (A), point dendrometer (left) and sap flow sensor (right) installed in a branch (B), and the final set‐up of a droughted tree showing the throughfall exclusion tarpaulin, culverts, and collection basins (C).

Benjamin M. Cranston, et al. Appl Plant Sci. 2020 Feb;8(2):e11325.
19.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems.

Plots of community dissimilarity based on pair-wise Aitchison distances (i.e., centered log-ratio transformed relative proportions of ASVs) among (A) sampling locations, (B) plots, and (C) throughfall and rainwater treatments. Aitchison distances are shown by a color ramp from light gray to green. A boxplot-and-whisker plot (D) compares plot-level mean Aitchison distances within throughfall samples, and between throughfall and rainwater treatments.

Zachary S. Ladin, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1629.
20.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems.

Box-and-whisker plots showing the difference in the count of unique ASVs detected among sampling groups: throughfall, throughfall and rainwater, and rainwater. Rainwater and throughfall treatments are shown in red and blue, respectively. Black lines denote medians, boxes represent 75% quantiles, red and blue dots show sample values, and lowercase letters indicate significant pair-wise differences (α = 0.05).

Zachary S. Ladin, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1629.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Support Center