Table 2Commonly used scales for risk assessment of pressure ulcers2025

ScaleDescriptionPopulationScoring
Braden6 subscales: mobility, activity, sensory perception, skin moisture, nutrition state and friction/shearGeneral6–23; lower scores indicate higher pressure ulcer risk
Cubbin and Jackson15 subscales: age, weight, medical history, skin condition, mental state, mobility, nutrition, respiration, incontinence, hygiene, hemodynamic state, oxygen requirements; use of blood products, surgery within 24 hours, hypothermiaIntensive care unit9–48; lower scores indicate higher pressure ulcer risk
Norton5 subscales: physical condition, mental state, activity, mobility, incontinenceGeneral5–20; lower scores indicate higher pressure ulcer risk
Waterlow11 subscales: build/weight for height, skin condition, sex and age, continence, mobility, appetite, medication, other risk factors (tissue malnutrition, neurological deficit, major surgery or trauma)General1–64; higher scores indicate higher pressure ulcer risk

From: Introduction

Cover of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention: Comparative Effectiveness
Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 87.
Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.