U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX22366284: GSM7881741: D0_TKO_CTCF_CUTnRUN_rep2; Mus musculus; OTHER
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina NovaSeq 6000) run: 14.3M spots, 4.3G bases, 1.3Gb downloads

External Id: GSM7881741_r1
Submitted by: Chromatin Dynamics in Mammalian Development, UMR 7592, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS, Université de Paris
Study: The impact of the embryonic DNA methylation program on CTCF-mediated genome regulation
show Abstracthide Abstract
During mammalian embryogenesis, both the 5-cytosine DNA methylation (5meC) landscape and three dimensional (3D) chromatin architecture are profoundly remodeled during a process known as “epigenetic reprogramming.” An understudied aspect of epigenetic reprogramming is how the 5meC flux, per se, affects the 3D genome. This is pertinent given the 5meC-sensitivity of a key regulator of chromosome folding: CTCF. We profiled the CTCF binding landscape using a mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation protocol that models the exit of naive pluripotency, wherein global DNA methylation levels start low and increase to somatic levels within four days. We took advantage of the fact that mouse ESCs lacking DNA methylation machinery exhibit globally similar differentiation dynamics, thus allowing for dissection of more nuanced effects of CTCF misregulation on gene expression. We carried this out by performing CTCF HiChIP in both wild-type and mutant conditions to assess aberrant CTCF-CTCF looping events in the absence of 5meC. We went on to assess the impact misregulated CTCF binding has on cis-regulatory contacts by performing H3K27ac HiChIP, given that H3K27ac is enriched on active promoters and enhancers. Using DNA methylation epigenome editing, we were able to directly demonstrate that the DNA methyl-mark is able to impact CTCF binding. Finally, a detailed dissection of the imprinted Zdbf2 gene showed how 5meC-antagonism of CTCF allows for proper gene regulation during differentiation. This work provides the most global picture to date of how DNA methylation impacts the 3D genome as the embryo prepares for gastrulation and lineage commitment. Overall design: HiChIP, CUT&RUN and 4C was performed on mouse embryonic stem cells and epiblast-like cells for CTCF. H3K27ac HiChIP was also performed on the same cells. 4C-seq was conducted on TET-1 epigenome-edited epiblast-like cells.
Sample: D0_TKO_CTCF_CUTnRUN_rep2
SAMN38092007 • SRS19414183 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Name: GSM7881741
Instrument: Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Strategy: OTHER
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: other
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: We performed CUT&RUN according to the original protocol (Skene and Henikoff 2017) with the following modifications: 500,000 cells were used for each sample, and the primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4ºC on a rotator. After incubation with pAG-MNase and performing the MNAse reaction, the samples were placed on a magnetic rack and the supernatant containing the DNA samples was recovered. Following addition of 0.1% SDS and 0.17mg/ml Proteinase K, samples were incubated at 50°C for 1h. Purified DNA was obtained by phenol/chloroform extraction and precipitated with 100% Ethanol by centrifugation. The DNA pellet was washed in 80% ethanol, spun down and air-dried before being resuspended in 25µl of 1mM Tris-HCl pH8.0. We used a primary CTCF antibody (Cell D31H2) or IgG control (SigmaAldrich I5006) and no secondary antibody was used for these experiments. The pAG-MNase plasmid was obtained from Addgene (#123461), and the protein was purified by the Curiecoretech Recombinant Protein Platform. Sequencing library preparation was made using the NEBNext® UltraTM II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) following the procedure described in “Library Prep for CUT&RUN with NEBNext® UltraTM II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (E7645) V.1” available in protocols.io. Quality control for the finalized libraries was performed using a TapeStation 420 system (Agilent). Libraries were sequenced by Novogene Co on a NovaSeq using paired-end 150 base pair parameters, requesting 4 gigabytes of data per sample, or approximately 13 million reads.
Runs: 1 run, 14.3M spots, 4.3G bases, 1.3Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR2666623914,318,1344.3G1.3Gb2024-07-23

ID:
30345554

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...