U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX2187104: GSM2326758: Sample_mDUX_DOXY_IgG; Mus musculus; ChIP-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2500) run: 22.4M spots, 2.2G bases, 850.4Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Conservation and innovation in the DUX4-family gene network (ChIP-seq)
show Abstracthide Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD; OMIM #158900, #158901) is caused by mis-expression of the DUX4 transcription factor in skeletal muscle1. Animal models of FSHD are hampered by incomplete knowledge of the conservation of the DUX4 transcriptional program in other species. Despite divergence of their binding motifs, both mouse Dux and human DUX4 activate genes associated with cleavage-stage embryos, including MERV-L and ERVL-MaLR retrotransposons, in mouse and human muscle cells respectively. When expressed in mouse cells, human DUX4 maintained modest activation of cleavage-stage genes driven by conventional promoters, but did not activate MERV-L-promoted genes. These findings indicate that the ancestral DUX4-factor regulated genes characteristic of cleavage-stage embryos driven by conventional promoters, whereas divergence of the DUX4/Dux homeodomains correlates with retrotransposon specificity. These results provide insight into how species balance conservation of a core transcriptional program with innovation at retrotransposon promoters and provide a basis for animal models that recreate the FSHD transcriptome. Overall design: We generated three new ChIP-seq datasets in mouse myoblasts and compared them to a published ChIP-seq dataset for human DUX4 expressed in human myoblasts (GSE33838; 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.013). All datasets were generated from monoclonal cell lines using a doxycycline-inducible system and codon-altered transgenes. For DUX4 peaks, we compared DUX4-expresssing cells at 24-hours of induction immunoprecipitated with a 50:50 mixture of the DUX4 antibodies MO488 and MO489 to DUX4-expressing cells immunoprecipitated with an antibody to an HA-tag, which was not present in these cells. For Dux peaks, we compared Dux-expressing cells at 24-hours of induction immunoprecipitated individually with each of two Dux antibodies (A-19 and S-20) to Dux-expressing cells immunoprecipitated with an antibody to IgG. 
Sample: Sample_mDUX_DOXY_IgG
SAMN05806619 • SRS1709942 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2500
Strategy: ChIP-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: ChIP
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: Briefly, ~6x10e7 cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 11 minutes, quenched with glycine, lysed, and then sonicated to generate final DNA fragments of 150–600 bp. The soluble chromatin was diluted 1:10 and pre-cleared with protein A:G beads for 2 hours. Remaining chromatin was incubated with primary antibody overnight, then protein A:G beads were added for an additional 2 hours. Beads were washed and then de-crosslinked overnight. ChIP-seq libraries were prepared from IP samples using an Ovation Ultralow Library System kit (NuGEN Technologies., San Carlos, CA, USA). ChIP-seq libraries were pooled (12-plex) and clustered onto two flow cell lanes.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM2326758
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 22.4M spots, 2.2G bases, 850.4Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR429160522,372,9712.2G850.4Mb2017-02-01

ID:
3182320

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...