U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX19352057: GSM7040491: M05-20522_3M_Liver_iPCRtag25; Mus musculus; Bisulfite-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2500) run: 23.3M spots, 2.9G bases, 1.1Gb downloads

External Id: GSM7040491_r1
Submitted by: Bioinformatics, The Babraham Institute
Study: Predicting age in single cells and low coverage DNA methylation data [RRBS]
show Abstracthide Abstract
Ageing is the accumulation of changes and overall decline of the function of cells, organs and organisms over time. At the molecular and cellular level, the concept of biological age has been established and novel biomarkers of biological age have been identified, notably epigenetic DNA-methylation based clocks. With the emergence of single-cell DNA methylation profiling methods, the possibility to study biological age of individual cells has been proposed, and a first proof-of-concept study, based on limited single cell datasets mostly from early developmental origin, indicated the feasibility and relevance of this approach to better understand organismal changes and cellular ageing heterogeneity. Here, we generated a large single-cell DNA methylation and matched transcriptome dataset from mouse peripheral blood samples, spanning a broad range of ages (10-101 weeks of age), and developed a robust single-cell DNA methylation age prediction model (scEpiAge-blood and also scEpiAge-liver). We find that our new scEpiAge can accurately predict age in a broad range of publicly available datasets, including very sparse data and it also predicts age in single cells. Interestingly, the epigenetic age distribution is wider than technically expected in 19% of single cells, suggesting that epigenetic age heterogeneity is present in vivo and may relate to functional differences between cells. In addition, we observe differences in epigenetic ageing between the major blood cell types. Our work provides a foundation for better single-cell and sparse data epigenetic age predictors and highlights the significance of cellular heterogeneity during ageing. Overall design: DNA was extracted from various tissue of mice spanning a range of ages and DNA methylation analysed using RRBS.
Sample: M05-20522_3M_Liver_iPCRtag25
SAMN33270256 • SRS16749137 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Name: GSM7040491
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2500
Strategy: Bisulfite-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: Reduced Representation
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: Genomic DNA was isolated from ~10 mg frozen tissue using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) RRBS libraries were prepared from isolated DNA following published protocols (Stubbs et al 2017). Briefly, RRBS libraries were prepared by MspI digestion of 100–500 ng genomic DNA, followed by end-repair and T-tailing using Klenow Exo- (Fermentas). Adapter ligation was performed overnight (in-house adapters) using T4 DNA Ligase (NEB), followed by a clean-up step using AMPure XP beads (Agencourt, 0.9×). Subsequently, libraries were bisulfite-treated according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma Imprint Kit; 2 step protocol) and purified using an automated liquid handling robotic system (Agilent Bravo). The libraries were amplified using KAPA HiFi Uracil HotStart DNA Polymerase (KAPA Biosystems), indexing the samples with individual primers. All amplified libraries were purified (AMPure XP beads, 0.8×) and assessed for quality and quantity using High-Sensitivity DNA chips on the Agilent Bioanalyzer.
Runs: 1 run, 23.3M spots, 2.9G bases, 1.1Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR2343861823,263,9652.9G1.1Gb2024-06-03

ID:
26610265

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...