U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX5848183: GSM3770815: ChIP-seq-L130-CRISPRi-CTCF_N4293-CTCF; Homo sapiens; ChIP-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (NextSeq 500) run: 13.2M spots, 2G bases, 811.4Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Identification and mitigation of pervasive off-target activity in CRISPR-Cas9 screens for essential non-coding elements
show Abstracthide Abstract
Pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens have recently emerged as a powerful method for functionally characterizing regulatory elements in the non-coding genome, but off-target effects in these experiments have not been systematically evaluated. Here, we conducted multiple genome-scale CRISPR screens for essential CTCF loop anchors in the human K562 erythroid cell line. Surprisingly, the primary drivers of apparent ``hits'' in this screen were single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) with low sequence specificity. After removing these confounders, we found that no CTCF loop anchors among the ones we screened are essential for cell growth in culture. We also observed analogous effects in independent non-coding screens densely tiling regulatory elements and genomic neighborhoods near previously known essential genes. Strikingly, we found that low-specificity guides also result in strong confounding growth effects in screens employing epigenetic perturbations that do not cause DNA damage, such as CRISPRi and CRISPRa. Remarkably, the set of confounded guides is distinct for each perturbation mode. Promisingly, strict filtering of CRISPRi libraries using GuideScan-aggregate specificity scores removed these confounded sgRNAs and allowed for the identification of essential enhancers, which we validated extensively. Our stduy presents the first genome-scale functional characterization of CTCF binding sites in the human genome, while also identifying the limitations on and outlining the future prospects for the detailed functional dissection of regulatory elements in the genome using Cas9. Overall design: This series contains dataset of several different types: 1) pooled CRISPR screens of non-coding genomic elements (tiling screens, screens targeting CTCF loop anchor sites, "fine-mapping" screens for insulator and enhancer elements) in the K562 cell line and 2) ATAC-seq, RNA-seq, ChIP-seq experiments examining the changes in gene expression, chromatin accessibility, and protein occupancy in a set of validation cell lines generated using individual sgRNAs)
Sample: ChIP-seq-L130-CRISPRi-CTCF_N4293-CTCF
SAMN11660685 • SRS4773035 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Homo sapiens
Library:
Instrument: NextSeq 500
Strategy: ChIP-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: ChIP
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: ChIP-seq experiments were carried out as follows. Briefly, 2x10^6 K562 cells were pelleted at 2000 g for 5 minutes at 4C and then resuspended in 1x PBS buffer; 37% formaldehyde solution (Sigma F8775) was added at a final concentration of 1%. Crosslinking was carried out at room temperature for 15 minutes, and then the reaction was quenched by adding 2.5 M Glycine solution at a final concentration of 0.25 M. Crosslinked cells were then pelleted at 2000 g for 5 minutes at 4C, washed with cold 1x PBS buffer, and stored at -80C.. CTCF ChIP was performed using a polyclonal anti-CTCF antibody (Millipore, 07-729). For each reaction, 100 uL of Protein A Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher 10001D) were washed 3 times with a 5 mg/mL BSA (Sigma A9418) solution. Beads were then resuspended in 1 mL BSA solution and 4 uL of CTCF antibody were added. Coupling of antibodies to beads was carried out overnight on a rotator at 4C. Beads were again washed 3 times with BSA solution, resuspended in 100 uL of BSA solution, mixed with 900 uL sonicated chromatin and incubated overnight on a rotator at 4C. Chromatin was sonicated using a tip sonicator (Misonix) after cells were lysed with Farnham Lysis Buffer (5 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 85 mM KCl, 0.5% IGEPAL, Roche Protease Inhibitor Cocktail), and nuclei were resuspended in RIPA buffer (1x PBS, 1% IGEPAL, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, Roche Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). The sonicated material was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4C for 15 minutes to remove cellular debris, and a portion of the supernatant was saved as input. After incubation with chromatin, beads were washed 5 times with LiCl buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM LiCl, 1% NP-40/IGEPAL, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate) by incubating for 10 minutes at 4C on a rotator and then rinsed once with 1x TE buffer. Beads were then resuspended in 200 uL IP Elution Buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO_3) and incubated at 65C in a Thermomixer (Eppendorf) with interval mixing to dissociate antibodies from chromatin. Beads were separated from chromatin by centrifugation, Proteinase K was added to the supernatant and crosslinks were reversed at 65C for \sim16 hours. Input samples (100 uL) were mixed with an equal volume of IP Elution Buffer, Proteinase K was added and cross-links were reversed together with the ChIP samples. DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl extraction followed by MinElute column (Qiagen) clean up. DNA concentration was measured using QuBIT, and libraries were generated using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, E7645S). Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq (Illumina) in a 2x75 bp format.
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 13.2M spots, 2G bases, 811.4Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR907220213,204,1012G811.4Mb2019-07-02

ID:
7858215

Supplemental Content

Search details

See more...

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...