NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsBibliographic details: Li W, Xiao L, Hu J. The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiratory Care 2013; 58(7): 1184-1195. [PubMed: 23287015]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of oral appliances (OAs) with those of CPAP in treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
METHODS: Relevant studies were retrieved from the following electronic databases, up to and including September 2012: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and Central Register of Controlled Trials. The main outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, health-related quality of life, cognitive performance, blood pressure, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), arousal index, minimum SpO2, percent rapid eye movement sleep, treatment usage, side effects, treatment preference, and withdrawals.
RESULTS: Fourteen trials were finally included in this review. Our results demonstrated that the effects on Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (P = .31 and .09 in crossover and parallel-group trials), health-related quality of life, cognitive performance, and blood pressure of OAs and CPAP were similar. Besides, pooled estimates of crossover trials suggested a significant difference in favor of CPAP regarding AHI (P < .001), arousal index (P = .001), and minimum SpO2 (P < .001), while pooled estimates of parallel-group trials showed a significant difference in favor of CPAP regarding AHI (P < .001) and percent rapid eye movement sleep (P = .02). Moreover, OAs and CPAP yielded fairly similar results in terms of treatment usage (P = .26 for hours/night in crossover trials, and P = .14 for hours/night and P = .19 for nights/week in parallel-group trials), treatment preference, side effects, and withdrawals (P = .34 in parallel-group trials).
CONCLUSIONS: CPAP yielded better polysomnography outcomes, especially in reducing AHI, than OAs, indicating that OAs were less effective than CPAP in improving sleep-disordered breathing. However, similar results from OAs and CPAP in terms of clinical and other related outcomes were found, suggesting that it would appear proper to offer OAs to patients who are unable or unwilling to persist with CPAP.
- Review The effect of oral appliances that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.[J Oral Rehabil. 2014]Review The effect of oral appliances that advanced the mandible forward and limited mouth opening in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Okuno K, Sato K, Arisaka T, Hosohama K, Gotoh M, Taga H, Sasao Y, Hamada S. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Jul; 41(7):542-54. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
- Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.[Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013]Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.Phillips CL, Grunstein RR, Darendeliler MA, Mihailidou AS, Srinivasan VK, Yee BJ, Marks GB, Cistulli PA. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr 15; 187(8):879-87.
- Effects of CPAP and mandibular advancement device treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.[Sleep Breath. 2018]Effects of CPAP and mandibular advancement device treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Schwartz M, Acosta L, Hung YL, Padilla M, Enciso R. Sleep Breath. 2018 Sep; 22(3):555-568. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
- Review Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.[Sleep Breath. 2007]Review Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.Hoffstein V. Sleep Breath. 2007 Mar; 11(1):1-22.
- Review Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.[Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006]Review Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.Giles TL, Lasserson TJ, Smith BJ, White J, Wright J, Cates CJ. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25; (1):CD001106. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
- The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: a ...The comparison of CPAP and oral appliances in treatment of patients with OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...