Table 78Results: SafeCare versus usual care

First Author et al., YearComparison GroupsSafety
Chaffin, et al., 201296G1: SafeCare
G2: SAU
CPS Recidivism*
4-strata pooled effect:
G1 > G2, p = 0.03 (full population)
Estimate=−0.186 (SE=0.087), HR=0.83 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98]

G1 > G2, p = 0.016 (preschool subpopulation)
Estimate=−0.301 (SE=0.125), HR=0.74 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.95]

Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM):
G1 > G2, p = 0.001 (full population)
Estimate=−0.181 (SE=0.056), HR=0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]

G1 > G2, p < 0.005 (preschool subpopulation)
Estimate=−0.241 (SE=0.086), HR=0.79 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93]

Note: Greater comparative benefit is denoted in the results tables using a greater (“>“) sign.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; CPS = Child Protective Services; G = group; HR = hazard ratio; SE = standard error;

*

= ITT analyses

From: Results

Cover of Child Exposure to Trauma: Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions Addressing Maltreatment
Child Exposure to Trauma: Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions Addressing Maltreatment [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 89.
Fraser JG, Lloyd SW, Murphy RA, et al.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.