Table D-2Risk of bias rating summary

DesignSimilar at BaselineFidelityAssessors BlindAll outcomes IncludedMeasure Equally AppliedAttrition ReportedAttrition >= 30%Differential Attrition >= 15%Randomization AdequateAllocation ConcealmentITT AnalysisProspectiveSame Source PopulationI/E CriteriaControl for DifferencesRating
Berliner, 19961RCTYYUYYYYUUUNNANANANAH
Bernard, 20122RCTYYYYYNUUUUUNANANANAM
Bos, 20093RCTNUUYYNUUUUNNANANANAM
Bos, 20104RCTYUUYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Bruce, 20095RCTUUUYYNUUUUNNANANANAM
Celano, 19966RCTYYYYYYYYUUNNANANANAH
Chaffin, 20047RCTYYUYYYUUUUYNANANANAM
Chaffin, 20098RCTYYUYYYNNYUYNANANANAL
Chaffin, 20119RCTYYUYYYNNYUYNANANANAL
Chaffin, 201210RCTYYYYYYNNUUNNANANANAL
Chamberlain, 200811RCTYYUYYYNUUUNNANANANAM
Cicchetti, 200612RCTUYUYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Cohen, 199613RCTUYUYYYNUUUNNANANANAM
Cohen, 199714RCTNYUYYYYUYYNNANANANAH
Cohen, 200415RCTYYYYYYNNUUYNANANANAL
Deblinger, 200116RCTYYNYYYNUUUNNANANANAM
Deblinger, 200617RCTUYUYYYYNUUNNANANANAH
Dozier, unpublished A18RCTYYYYYNUUUUUNANANANAM
Dozier, unpublished B19RCTUYUYYNUUUUNNANANANAM
Dozier, 200620RCTYYYNYNUUUUUNANANANAM
Dozier, 200821RCTNYYYYNUUUUNNANANANAM
Dozier, 200922RCTYYYYYNUUUUNNANANANAM
Fisher, 200023PCNUUYYNUUNANANAYNNNH
Fisher, 200524RCTYYUYYUUUUUUNANANANAM
Fisher, 2007a25RCTYYUYYUUUUUUNANANANAM
Fisher, 2007b26RCTYUYYYUUUUUUNANANANAM
Fisher, 200827RCTYYYYYUUUUUUNANANANAM
Fisher, 200928RCTNYUYYNUUUUUNANANANAM
Fisher, 2011a29RCTYYUYYYNUYUNNANANANAM
Fisher, 2011b30RCTUUUYUYNYUUNNANANANAH
Fox, 201131RCTUUUYYYNNUUNNANANANAM
Gershater-Molko, 200232CCUUUYYNANANANANANANNUNH
Ghera, 200933RCTYUYYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Grayston, 199534PCUUUYYYNYNANANAYYYNH
Jaberghaderi, 200435RCTYUYYYYNNYNNNANANANAM
Jinich, 199936RCTYYYYYYUUUYNNANANANAM
Johnson, 201037RCTYUUYYYNNUUNNANANANAM
Jouriles, 201038RCTYYYYYYNYYUNNANANANAH
Kim, 201139RCTYYYYYYNNYYYNANANANAL
Leathers, 201140PCUYUYYYYYNANANAYYUYH
Letarte, 201041PCYYUYNYNYNANANAYYYNH
Lewis-Morrarty, 201242RCTYUUYUNUUUNNNANANANAM
Linares, 200643RCTNYYYYYNNUUYNANANANAL
MacMillain, 200544RCTYUYYYYNNYYYNANANANAL
Marshall, 200845RCTYNUYYYUUUUYNANANANAM
McDermott, 201246RCTUUUYYYNNUUNNANANANAM
McGain, 199547NCTUUUYYNUUNANANAYYUNM
McLaughlin, 201148RCTYUUYYYNNUUNNANANANAM
McLaughlin, 201249RCTYUYYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Meezan, 1998a50RCTUUUYYYYYUUNNANANANAH
Meezan, 1998b51RCTUUUYYYYYUUNNANANANAH
Moss, 201152RCTYYYYYYNNYUNNANANANAM
Nelson, 200753RCTYUUYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Nilsen, 200754PCNUUYYNUUNANANAYYNNH
Nolan, 200255PCYUUYYYNYNANANAYYUNH
Price, 200856RCTYYUYYNUUUUUNANANANAM
Reams, 199457RCTNUYYYNUUUUUNANANANAH
Runyon, 201058RCTNYYYYYNNYYNNANANANAM
Smith, 201159RCTYYYYYNUUYYUNANANANAM
Smyke, 2010 60RCTYUYYYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Sprang, 200961RCTYYNYYYNNUNYNANANANAM
Taussig, 201062RCTNYYYYYNNYUYNANANANAL
Taussig, 201263RCTNYYYYYNNYUYNANANANAL
Toth, 200264RCTNYYYYYNNUUNNANANANAM
Trowell, 200265RCTYYUNYYNNUUYNANANANAM
Weikert, 201266PCNUUYYYNUNANANAYYNNH
Windsor, 201167RCTUUUYYNUUUUYNANANANAM
Zeanah, 200168NCCYUNYYNUUNANANANNYYM
Zeanah, 200969RCTYUUYYYNNUUYNANANANAM

Abbreviations: CC = case control; H = High risk of bias, M = Medium risk of bias, L = Low risk of bias; N = No, NA = Not Applicable, PC = prospective control; RCT = randomized controlled trial; U = Unknown (not reported or unclear), Y = Yes

From: Appendix D, Risk of Bias Tables

Cover of Child Exposure to Trauma: Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions Addressing Maltreatment
Child Exposure to Trauma: Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions Addressing Maltreatment [Internet].
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 89.
Fraser JG, Lloyd SW, Murphy RA, et al.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.