NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].
Show detailsCRD summary
This review concluded that low-strength evidence suggested that bridging strategies (interventions before and after discharge, with dedicated transition provider) reduced readmission or emergency department visits. No conclusions could be reached on adverse events. The strategies hospitals should implement to improve patient safety on discharge remained unclear. The authors' conclusions are likely to be reliable.
Authors' objectives
To assess the effectiveness of hospital-initiated care transition strategies, in preventing adverse outcomes, after discharge.
Searching
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for studies, reported in English, from January 1990 to September 2012. The search strategy was reported in an online supplement.
Study selection
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials that assessed a transitional care strategy, initiated before hospital discharge, were eligible for inclusion. A transitional care strategy was defined as one or more interventions aimed at ensuring a safe and effective transition of the patient from an acute in-patient setting to home. Trials that focused on transition from hospital to another acute or subacute care setting were excluded. Trials had to enrol an unselected population of adult general medical patients. Outcomes eligible for inclusion were adverse events after discharge, emergency department use, or readmission after discharge home. Primary outcomes were events within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were events within one year of discharge.
Approximately half the included trials were conducted in the USA; the locations for the other trials were not reported. Just over half the trials were of older adult populations, while a quarter were of individuals at a high risk of readmission or adverse events. A few trials were of patients receiving polypharmacy or a "high-risk" medication. Definitions of all the risk factors, including older adults, varied considerably between trials. A median of four strategies were investigated (range one to eight), and most trials had intervention components before and after discharge (bridging strategy). The most common strategies involved patient engagement, outreach after discharge, and (in interventions with a bridging strategy) a designated transition provider. Details were reported in the paper.
Two reviewers independently assessed the full papers for inclusion.
Assessment of study quality
Two reviewers independently assessed the trials, using the Cochrane Collaboration's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care checklist. Trials were rated, and the strength of evidence was assessed, using the methods of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus and in consultation with a third reviewer, if necessary.
Data extraction
The study characteristics and outcome incidences were extracted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus and a third reviewer was consulted, where necessary.
Methods of synthesis
Variation in trial characteristics meant that a narrative synthesis was conducted.
Results of the review
Forty-seven trials were included in the review. Twenty-eight were RCTs (with 11,938 patients) and 19 were controlled clinical trials. Most were of fair methodological quality.
Adverse events after discharge: Three of nine trials reported statistically significant reductions in the rate of adverse events, after discharge, with their interventions. All three of these trials were of interventions led by pharmacists. Two other pharmacist-led intervention trials reported reductions that were not statistically significant; these trials did not have sufficient patients to produce significant results.
Thirty-day readmission and emergency department visits: Eight of 22 trials (four of 12 RCTs) reported statistically significant reductions in readmissions, emergency department visits, or a composite of these outcomes. Six of the eight trials used a bridging intervention. Fourteen trials (eight RCTs) reported no statistically significant difference between their groups; four of these used bridging interventions. Trials reporting significant and non-significant findings were broadly comparable in size and quality.
Readmission and emergency department visits beyond 30 days: Twenty-six trials reported intervals ranging from 45 days to one year after discharge. Seven trials reported statistically significant reductions in readmissions; four of these used a bridging intervention.
The factors associated with the successful implementation of transitional care interventions could not be assessed, as the trials did not report these. The Care Transitions Intervention was the only strategy assessed in more than one context.
Cost information
Sixteen trials reported the costs of health care use with the intervention and comparison groups; none reported the cost of the actual intervention. The resource use data were from varying sources and measured over different periods of time. It was not therefore possible to draw firm conclusions on the impact of the interventions on care costs.
Authors' conclusions
Low-strength evidence indicated that a bridging strategy, with interventions before and after discharge, and a dedicated transition provider, reduced hospital readmission or emergency department visits. Due to limited evidence, no conclusions could be reached on the best methods to prevent adverse events after discharge. The strategies hospitals should implement to improve patient safety on discharge remained unclear.
CRD commentary
This review addressed a clear question supported by specific inclusion criteria. Despite the requirement for an unselected general medical population, it appears that most trials selected patients on their age, risk profile or polypharmacy. Most trials excluded patients with cognitive impairment or dementia, so generalisation to an unselected population or to these high-risk groups may be limited. The search was thorough, but it was not clear what impact the restriction to trials in English might have had. The authors reported methods designed to reduce reviewer bias and error at all stages of the review process. Appropriate methods were used to assess trial quality. The narrative synthesis was appropriate.
The authors' conclusions were based on the reasonable quality of the evidence, together with the variability in the interventions, and the effects of the interventions. If this level of variance is borne in mind, the conclusions are likely to be reliable.
Implications of the review for practice and research
Practice: The authors did not state any specific implications for practice, but they noted that the few resource-intensive interventions to reduce hospital readmissions that were successful might be difficult to implement in the context of other pressing safety issues. They stated that the interventions an individual hospital could implement to improve transitional care remain largely undefined.
Research: The authors stated that there was a need for larger trials, of clinical pharmacist-led medication checking interventions, that explicitly plan to measure adverse events. They highlighted the need for standard intervention terminology and reproducibility; to identify target populations most likely to benefit from specific interventions; to measure patient-centred outcomes; and to rigorously report and evaluate the costs and implementation factors.
Funding
Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), USA.
Bibliographic details
Rennke S, Nguyen OK, Shoeb MH, Magan Y, Wachter RM, Ranji SR. Hospital-initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 433-440. [PubMed: 23460101]
Original Paper URL
Other publications of related interest
Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Comparative Effectiveness Review; 211. 2013.
Weaver SJ, Lubomski LH, Wilson RF, Pfoh ER, Martinez KA, Dy SM. Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 369-374.
Reston JT, Schoelles KM. In-facility delirium prevention programs as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 375-380.
Kwan JL, Lo L, Sampson M, Shojania KG. Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 397-403.
McDonald KM, Matesic B, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lonhart J, Schmidt E, Pineda N, Ioannidis JP. Patient safety strategies targeted at diagnostic errors: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 381-389.
Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Ganz DA, Shekelle PG. Inpatient fall prevention programs as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 390-393.
Sullivan N, Schoelles KM. Preventing in-facility pressure ulcers as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 410-416.
Shekelle PG. Nurse-patient ratios as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 404-409.
Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 417-425.
Schmidt E, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Ho LA, McDonald KM. Simulation exercises as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013; 158(5 Part 2): 426-432.
Indexing Status
Subject indexing assigned by NLM
MeSH
Emergency Service, Hospital /statistics & numerical data; Hospital Administration; Hospital Costs; Humans; Patient Discharge /standards; Patient Readmission /statistics & numerical data; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Safety Management /economics /methods /organization & administration
AccessionNumber
Database entry date
14/03/2013
Record Status
This is a critical abstract of a systematic review that meets the criteria for inclusion on DARE. Each critical abstract contains a brief summary of the review methods, results and conclusions followed by a detailed critical assessment on the reliability of the review and the conclusions drawn.
- CRD summary
- Authors' objectives
- Searching
- Study selection
- Assessment of study quality
- Data extraction
- Methods of synthesis
- Results of the review
- Cost information
- Authors' conclusions
- CRD commentary
- Implications of the review for practice and research
- Funding
- Bibliographic details
- Original Paper URL
- Other publications of related interest
- Indexing Status
- MeSH
- AccessionNumber
- Database entry date
- Record Status
- Review Effectiveness of discharge interventions from hospital to home on hospital readmissions: a systematic review.[JBI Database System Rev Implem...]Review Effectiveness of discharge interventions from hospital to home on hospital readmissions: a systematic review.Braet A, Weltens C, Sermeus W. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb; 14(2):106-73.
- Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.[J Hosp Med. 2009]Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.Koehler BE, Richter KM, Youngblood L, Cohen BA, Prengler ID, Cheng D, Masica AL. J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr; 4(4):211-8.
- Nurse and patient perceptions of discharge readiness in relation to postdischarge utilization.[Med Care. 2010]Nurse and patient perceptions of discharge readiness in relation to postdischarge utilization.Weiss M, Yakusheva O, Bobay K. Med Care. 2010 May; 48(5):482-6.
- Review Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.[Ann Intern Med. 2013]Review Medication reconciliation during transitions of care as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.Kwan JL, Lo L, Sampson M, Shojania KG. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5; 158(5 Pt 2):397-403.
- Patient- and family-centred care transition interventions for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.[Int J Qual Health Care. 2023]Patient- and family-centred care transition interventions for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Chartrand J, Shea B, Hutton B, Dingwall O, Kakkar A, Chartrand M, Poulin A, Backman C. Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Dec 26; 35(4).
- Hospital-initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy:...Hospital-initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...