TABLE 17Pulmonary embolism

StudyRobotic, n/N (%)Laparoscopic, n/N (%)Open, n/N (%)
Carlsson 20101042/1253 (0.2)5/485 (1.0)
Dahl 20061471/104 (1.0)0/102
Krambeck 20091080/2485/492 (1.0)
Rozet 2007960/1331/133 (0.8)
Salomon 20021401/155 (0.6)1/151 (0.7)

From: 4, Clinical effectiveness of robotic compared with laparoscopic techniques

Cover of Systematic Review and Economic Modelling of the Relative Clinical Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Surgery for Removal of the Prostate in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer
Systematic Review and Economic Modelling of the Relative Clinical Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Surgery for Removal of the Prostate in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer.
Health Technology Assessment, No. 16.41.
Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2012 Nov.
© 2012, Crown Copyright.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.