Home > DARE Reviews > Usefulness of diffusion-weighted...

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Review published: 2012.

Bibliographic details: Wu LM, Xu JR, Gu HY, Hua J, Chen J, Zhang W, Zhu J, Ye YQ, Hu J.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Academic Radiology 2012; 19(10): 1215-1224. [PubMed: 22958718]

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published from January 2001 to August 2011 evaluating the diagnostic performance of DWI in detecting prostate carcinoma. Sensitivities and specificities were determined across studies, and summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed using hierarchical regression models.

RESULTS: Sixteen studies (18 subsets) with a total of 852 patients were included. Six studies (seven subsets) examining men with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer (260 patients) had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.95) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.90), respectively. Compared to patients at high risk for clinically relevant cancer, sensitivity was higher in low-risk patients (0.94 [95% CI, 0.89-0.97] vs 0.62 [95% CI, 0.54-0.70], P < .05), but specificity was lower (0.86 [95% CI, 0.72-0.94] vs 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.93], P < .05). Ten studies (11 subsets) examining patients with suspected prostate cancer (592 patients) had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.68-0.84) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91). Sensitivity was lower in high-risk patients (0.74 [95% CI, 0.57-0.87] vs 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84], P > .05), but specificity was higher (0.92 [95% CI, 0.89-0.94] vs 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84], P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of small studies suggest that DWI could be a rule-in test for high-risk patients. Further prospective studies including larger populations are necessary to confirm the actual value of DWI in this field.

Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PMID: 22958718

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...