TABLE 2Accuracy data

StudyTest and outcome levelTPFPTNFNSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
TP/TP + FNTN/TN + FPTP/TP + FPTN/TN + FN
Tsunoda 200853FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, LN group level (proximal, distal), visual diagnosis149118350.2860.9290.6090.771
FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, LN group level, size diagnosis156121340.3060.9530.7140.781
FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, LN group level, SUV diagnosis 1.52612115230.5310.9060.6840.833
FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, LN group level, SUV diagnosis 2.5197120300.3880.9450.7310.800
FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, LN group level, SUV diagnosis 3.5120127370.2451.0001.0000.774
FDG PET/CT, proximal nodal group staging, patient level, SUV diagnosis 1.5 (optimal cut-off value)21740200.5120.8510.7500.667
FDG PET/CT, distant nodal group staging, SUV diagnosis 1.5 (optimal cut-off value)567430.6250.9250.4550.961
Tateishi 200754FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, patient level2911850.8530.4210.7250.615
Contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT, nodal staging, patient level2961350.8530.6840.8290.722
FDG PET/CT, pararectal nodal staging, patient level24101180.7500.5240.7060.579
Contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT, pararectal nodal staging, patient level2951630.9060.7620.8530.842
FDG PET/CT, internal iliac nodal staging, patient level5730110.3130.8110.4170.732
Contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT, internal iliac nodal staging, patient level1253240.7500.8650.7060.889
FDG PET/CT, obturator nodal staging, patient level8162540.6670.6100.3330.862
Contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT, obturator nodal staging, patient level823940.6670.9510.8000.907

LN, lymph node; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SUV, standardised uptake value.

From: 5, FDG PET/CT for the pre-operative staging of primary colorectal cancer

Cover of The Value of FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computerised Tomography (PET/CT) in Pre-Operative Staging of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation
The Value of FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computerised Tomography (PET/CT) in Pre-Operative Staging of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation.
Health Technology Assessment, No. 15.35.
Brush J, Boyd K, Chappell F, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2011 Sep.
© 2011, Crown Copyright.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.