TABLE 58Quality assessment for included studies of routine surveillance tests

Study IDQ1Q2Q3aQ3bQ4Q5aQ5bQ6Q7Q8Q9Q10Q11Q12
Boné 199564-+?++++++??+++
Drew 199867++?+-++++?++++
Viehweg 200470++?+++++??-+-+
Shin 200571++++?+?++?-+++
Kim 200965++?++++++?-+?+

NA, not applicable; +, yes to the question; − , no to the question; ?, unclear.

From: Appendix 23, Quality assessment of individual studies included in the systematic review of test performance of surveillance mammography and comparator tests in detecting IBTR/MCBC

Cover of The Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Different Surveillance Mammography Regimens After the Treatment for Primary Breast Cancer: Systematic Reviews, Registry Database Analyses and Economic Evaluation
The Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Different Surveillance Mammography Regimens After the Treatment for Primary Breast Cancer: Systematic Reviews, Registry Database Analyses and Economic Evaluation.
Health Technology Assessment, No. 15.34.
Robertson C, Arcot Ragupathy SK, Boachie C, et al.
Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2011 Sep.
© 2011, Crown Copyright.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.