Home > DARE Reviews > Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for...

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. York (UK): Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 1995-.

Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet].

Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for patients with infected sternal wounds: a meta-analysis of current evidence

Review published: 2011.

Bibliographic details: Damiani G, Pinnarelli L, Sommella L, Tocco MP, Marvulli M, Magrini P, Ricciardi W.  Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for patients with infected sternal wounds: a meta-analysis of current evidence. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 2011; 64(9): 1119-1123. [PubMed: 21256819]

Abstract

Acute and chronic wound infections are the main reasons for the observed increase in mortality rate and represent a significant risk factor in hospitalisation. From the patient's perspective, wound therapy is an uncomfortable, painful and long-term treatment. Modern sternal-wound-treatment systems would be expected to shorten wound healing and hospital stay periods. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is a system that promotes wound healing through the application of negative pressure by controlled suction to the wound surface. The application of controlled levels of negative pressure accelerates healing in many types of wounds. There are a number of scientific publications that have used meta-analysis to compare VAC and traditional therapy, considering changes in wound size. This article surveys the research literature focussing on the management of wound infections. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of VAC compared with conventional therapy on length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Six articles were selected that included a total of 321 patients (169 for VAC therapy and 152 for conventional therapy). The meta-analysis showed that VAC therapy resulted in a decrease of 7.18 days in hospital LOS (confidence interval (CI) 95%: 10.82, 3.54), with no significant impact on mortality. Our data provide robust evidence of the effectiveness of VAC therapy.

Copyright © 2010 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

CRD has determined that this article meets the DARE scientific quality criteria for a systematic review.

Copyright © 2014 University of York.

PMID: 21256819

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...