Home > For Consumers > Homocysteine‐lowering interventions...

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Plain Language Summaries [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003-. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006612.pub5

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Plain Language Summaries [Internet].

Homocysteine‐lowering interventions (B‐complex vitamin therapy) for preventing cardiovascular events

First published: August 17, 2017.

Link to full article: [Cochrane Library]

Plain language summary

Review question

We reviewed whether particular vitamins, which lower homocysteine, prevent cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke.

Background

Cardiovascular disease, which includes heart attacks and strokes, is the number one cause of death worldwide. Many people with cardiovascular disease may not have symptoms, but be at high risk. Diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, smoking and a high cholesterol, as well as a family history of cardiovascular disease are well known risk factors. Elevated total homocysteine levels have recently been identified as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Homocysteine is an amino acid, its levels in the blood are influenced by blood levels of B vitamins: cyanocobalamin (B12), folic acid (B9) and pyridoxine (B6). This report is an update from a previous review published in 2015.

Study characteristics

The evidence is current to June 2017. We included 15 studies involving 71,422 participants living in countries with or without mandatory supplementation of foods with vitamins. These studies compared different regimens of B vitamins (cyanocobalamin (B12), folic acid (B9) and pyridoxine (B6)) with a control or any other comparison group. The studies were published between 2002 and 2015.

Key results

We found no evidence that homocysteine‐lowering interventions, in the form of supplements of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 given alone or in combination, at any dosage compared with placebo, or standard care, prevented heart attack or reduced death rates in participants at risk of, or living with cardiovascular disease. Homocysteine‐lowering interventions combined with antihypertensive medication had uncertain effects on stroke, approximately 143 people would need to be treated for 5.4 years to prevent 1 stroke. Homocysteine‐lowering interventions compared with placebo or any other comparison did not affect serious adverse events (cancer).

Quality of evidence

The quality of evidence from these studies was generally high.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease, which includes coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease, is a leading cause of death worldwide. Homocysteine is an amino acid with biological functions in methionine metabolism. A postulated risk factor for cardiovascular disease is an elevated circulating total homocysteine level. The impact of homocysteine‐lowering interventions, given to patients in the form of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 supplements, on cardiovascular events has been investigated. This is an update of a review previously published in 2009, 2013, and 2015.

Objectives: To determine whether homocysteine‐lowering interventions, provided to patients with and without pre‐existing cardiovascular disease are effective in preventing cardiovascular events, as well as reducing all‐cause mortality, and to evaluate their safety.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1946 to 1 June 2017), Embase (1980 to 2017 week 22) and LILACS (1986 to 1 June 2017). We also searched Web of Science (1970 to 1 June 2017). We handsearched the reference lists of included papers. We also contacted researchers in the field. There was no language restriction in the search.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of homocysteine‐lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events with a follow‐up period of one year or longer. We considered myocardial infarction and stroke as the primary outcomes. We excluded studies in patients with end stage renal disease.

Data collection and analysis: We performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction in duplicate. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB). We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. We used a random‐effects model. We conducted trial sequential analyses, Bayes factor, and fragility indices where appropriate.

Main results: In this third update, we identified three new randomised controlled trials, for a total of 15 randomised controlled trials involving 71,422 participants. Nine trials (60%) had low risk of bias, length of follow‐up ranged from one to 7.3 years. Compared with placebo, there were no differences in effects of homocysteine‐lowering interventions on myocardial infarction (homocysteine‐lowering = 7.1% versus placebo = 6.0%; RR 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.10, I2 = 0%, 12 trials; N = 46,699; Bayes factor 1.04, high‐quality evidence), death from any cause (homocysteine‐lowering = 11.7% versus placebo = 12.3%, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06, I2 = 0%, 11 trials, N = 44,817; Bayes factor = 1.05, high‐quality evidence), or serious adverse events (homocysteine‐lowering = 8.3% versus comparator = 8.5%, RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.14, I2 = 0%, eight trials, N = 35,788; high‐quality evidence). Compared with placebo, homocysteine‐lowering interventions were associated with reduced stroke outcome (homocysteine‐lowering = 4.3% versus comparator = 5.1%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, I2 = 8%, 10 trials, N = 44,224; high‐quality evidence). Compared with low doses, there were uncertain effects of high doses of homocysteine‐lowering interventions on stroke (high = 10.8% versus low = 11.2%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.22, I2 = 72%, two trials, N = 3929; very low‐quality evidence).

We found no evidence of publication bias.

Authors' conclusions: In this third update of the Cochrane review, there were no differences in effects of homocysteine‐lowering interventions in the form of supplements of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 given alone or in combination comparing with placebo on myocardial infarction, death from any cause or adverse events. In terms of stroke, this review found a small difference in effect favouring to homocysteine‐lowering interventions in the form of supplements of vitamins B6, B9 or B12 given alone or in combination comparing with placebo.

There were uncertain effects of enalapril plus folic acid compared with enalapril on stroke; approximately 143 (95% CI 85 to 428) people would need to be treated for 5.4 years to prevent 1 stroke, this evidence emerged from one mega‐trial.

Trial sequential analyses showed that additional trials are unlikely to increase the certainty about the findings of this issue regarding homocysteine‐lowering interventions versus placebo. There is a need for additional trials comparing homocysteine‐lowering interventions combined with antihypertensive medication versus antihypertensive medication, and homocysteine‐lowering interventions at high doses versus homocysteine‐lowering interventions at low doses. Potential trials should be large and co‐operative.

Editorial Group: Cochrane Heart Group.

Publication status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed).

Citation: Martí‐Carvajal AJ, Solà I, Lathyris D, Dayer M. Homocysteine‐lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD006612. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006612.pub5. Link to Cochrane Library. [PubMed: 28816346]

Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PMID: 28816346

Download

PubMed Health Blog...

read all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...