Table F11Association between body composition and DCIS

StudyComparison Categories of Body Mass Index, kg/m2: Estimate (95% CI)
Body mass index, kg/m2
Weiss, 199664
Design: Case control study
Source: SEER
22–24.59 vs.<22: 0.55 (0.4; 0.9) (OR)
24.6–29.02 vs.<22: 0.57 (0.4; 0.9) (OR)
>29.03 vs. <22: 0.41 (0.2; 0.7) (OR)
Gapstur, 199969
Design: Prospective cohort study
Source: IWHS
24.3–28.3 vs. <24.3: 1.11 (0.77; 1.61) (RR)
>28.3 vs. <24.3: 1.18 (0.82; 1.7) (RR)
Body mass index at age categories
Gapstur, 199969
Design: Prospective cohort study
Source: IWHS
20.2–22.3 vs.<20.2 at age 18: 1.38 (0.98; 1.95) (RR)
>22.3 vs.<20.2 at age 18: 0.73 (0.49; 1.1) (RR)
Kerlikowskec, 199765
Design: Cross-sectional
Source: Screening Program (CA)
>25 among 30–49 years old: 0.4 (0.2; 0.9) (OR)
>25 among >50 years old: 1.1 (0.6;1.9) (OR)
Waist-to-hip ratio
Gapstur, 199969
Design: Prospective cohort study
Source: IWHS
0.79–0.87 vs. <0.79: 1.09 (0.76; 1.58) (RR)
>0.87 vs. <0.79: 1.12 (0.77; 1.62) (RR)

From: Appendix F, Evidence Tables

Cover of Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS).
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 185.
Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM, et al.

PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.