Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 6;102(19):1489-95. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq345. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

Breast cancer incidence and hormone replacement therapy in Canada.

Author information

1
MHSc, Cancer Control Policy, Canadian Cancer Society, 10 Alcorn Ave, Ste 200, Toronto, ON, Canada M4V 3B1. pde@cancer.ca

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In 2002, results of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial indicated that the long-term risks of combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy outweighed the health benefits for postmenopausal women. The resulting decline in use of hormone replacement therapy was followed by concurrent decreases in breast cancer incidence in several countries. The aim of the current study was to determine whether similar declines occurred in Canada.

METHODS:

Data on prescriptions for hormone therapy were obtained from a national registry of pharmacy-filled prescriptions to confirm the reported trend in use of hormone replacement therapy among approximately 1200 women aged 50-69 years who participated in the National Population Health Survey between 1996 and 2006 and whose data were extrapolated to the Canadian female population. Age-standardized incidence rates for breast cancer were obtained from the population-based Canadian Cancer Registry for the same period, and mammography rates were obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Joinpoint regression was used to examine changes in trends in the use of hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer incidence.

RESULTS:

A reduced frequency of use of hormone replacement therapy was reflected in the decrease in dispensed hormone therapy prescriptions after 2002. The largest drop in use of combined hormone replacement therapy (from 12.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.1% to 14.2%, to 4.9%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 6.8%, of all women) occurred between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2004, among women aged 50-69 years. This drop occurred concurrently with a 9.6% decline in the incidence rate of breast cancer (from 296.3 per 100,000 women, 95% CI = 290.8 to 300.5 per 100,000 women, in 2002 to 268.0 per 100,000 women, 95% CI = 263.3 to 273.5 per 100,000 women, in 2004). Mammography rates were stable at 72% over the same period.

CONCLUSION:

During the period 2002-2004, there was a link between the declines in the use of hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer incidence among Canadian women aged 50-69 years, in the absence of any change in mammography rates.

PMID:
20864685
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/djq345
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center