Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Med Care. 2014 Nov;52(11):989-97. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000232.

Effectiveness of the Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA) intervention in low-income Latinos.

Author information

1
*Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Somerville, MA †Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA ‡Behavioral Sciences Research Institute, University of Puerto Rico Medical School, San Juan, PR §Department of Psychology, New York University, NY ∥Department of Psychology, Clark University, MA ¶Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA #Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA **Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY ††Department of Psychiatry, MSC-University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Persistent disparities in access and quality of mental health care for Latinos indicate a need for evidence-based, culturally adapted, and outside-the-clinic-walls treatments.

OBJECTIVE:

Evaluate treatment effectiveness of telephone (ECLA-T) or face-to-face (ECLA-F) delivery of a 6-8 session cognitive behavioral therapy and care management intervention for low-income Latinos, as compared to usual care for depression.

DESIGN:

Multisite randomized controlled trial.

SETTING:

Eight community health clinics in Boston, Massachusetts and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

PARTICIPANTS:

257 Latino patients recruited from primary care between May 2011 and September 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The primary outcome was severity of depression, assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20. The secondary outcome was functioning over the previous 30 days, measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS 2.0).

RESULTS:

Both telephone and face-to-face versions of the Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA) were more effective than usual care. The effect sizes of both intervention conditions on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were moderate when combined data from both sites are analyzed (0.56 and 0.64 for face-to-face and telephone, respectively). Similarly, effect sizes of ECLA-F and ECLA-T on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist were quite large in the Boston site (0.64 and 0.73. respectively) but not in Puerto Rico (0.10 and 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

The intervention appears to help Latino patients reduce depressive symptoms and improve functioning. Of particular importance is the higher treatment initiation for the telephone versus face-to-face intervention (89.7% vs. 78.8%), which suggests that telephone-based care may improve access and quality of care.

PMID:
25310525
PMCID:
PMC4201237
DOI:
10.1097/MLR.0000000000000232
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center