Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 1011

1.

[French national cancer screening programs: What does the future hold?]

de Bels F, Barré S, Catajar N, Le Bail M.

Rev Prat. 2019 Jan;69(1):102-106. French.

PMID:
30983297
2.

Technical Note: Noise models for virtual clinical trials of digital breast tomosynthesis.

Borges LR, Barufaldi B, Caron RF, Bakic PR, Foi A, Maidment ADA, Vieira MAC.

Med Phys. 2019 Apr 11. doi: 10.1002/mp.13534. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30972769
3.

Is Digital Breast Tomosynthesis the Better Mammogram for Local Breast Cancer Staging?

Moy L.

Radiology. 2019 Apr 9:190590. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190590. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

PMID:
30964742
4.

Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.

Fontaine M, Tourasse C, Pages E, Laurent N, Laffargue G, Millet I, Molinari N, Taourel P.

Radiology. 2019 Apr 9:182457. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182457. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30964425
5.

Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.

Destounis S.

Acad Radiol. 2019 Apr 5. pii: S1076-6332(19)30114-X. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.003. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

PMID:
30962072
6.

Good News for Older Women Undergoing Screening Mammography with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Philpotts LE, Durand MA.

Radiology. 2019 Apr 2:190426. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190426. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

PMID:
30942669
7.

Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.

Bahl M, Pinnamaneni N, Mercaldo S, McCarthy AM, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2019 Apr 2:181637. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181637. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30938625
8.

Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Full-Field Digital Mammography? A Multireader, Multicase Study of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis.

Georgian-Smith D, Obuchowski NA, Lo JY, Brem RF, Baker JA, Fisher PR, Rim A, Zhao W, Fajardo LL, Mertelmeier T.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr 1:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20294. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30933648
9.

Accuracy of Synthetic 2D Mammography Compared With Conventional 2D Digital Mammography Obtained With 3D Tomosynthesis.

Simon K, Dodelzon K, Drotman M, Levy A, Arleo EK, Askin G, Katzen J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar 27:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20520. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30917028
10.

Three-dimensionally-printed anthropomorphic physical phantom for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis with custom materials, lesions, and uniform quality control region.

Rossman AH, Catenacci M, Zhao C, Sikaria D, Knudsen JE, Dawes D, Gehm ME, Samei E, Wiley BJ, Lo JY.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Apr;6(2):021604. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.021604. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

PMID:
30915385
11.

Model and human observer reproducibility for detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis images of three-dimensionally structured test object.

Petrov D, Marshall N, Young K, Zhang G, Bosmans H.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Jan;6(1):015503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.015503. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

PMID:
30915383
12.

A new breast tomosynthesis imaging method: Continuous Sync-and-Shoot - technical feasibility and initial experience.

Jousi MO, Erkkilä J, Varjonen M, Soiva M, Hukkinen K, Blanco Sequeiros R.

Acta Radiol Open. 2019 Mar 15;8(3):2058460119836255. doi: 10.1177/2058460119836255. eCollection 2019 Mar.

13.

Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.

Le EPV, Wang Y, Huang Y, Hickman S, Gilbert FJ.

Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Review.

PMID:
30898381
14.

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Density Using Transmission Ultrasound Tomography.

Wiskin J, Malik B, Natesan R, Lenox M.

Med Phys. 2019 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/mp.13503. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30893476
15.

[Key technologies in digital breast tomosynthesis system:theory, design, and optimization].

Li M, Ma K, Tao X, Wang Y, He J, Wei Z, Chen G, Li S, Zeng D, Bian Z, Wu G, Liao S, Ma J.

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019 Feb 28;39(2):192-200. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.09.11. Chinese.

PMID:
30890508
16.

Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Gastounioti A, McCarthy AM, Pantalone L, Synnestvedt M, Kontos D, Conant EF.

Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):320-327. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181740. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

PMID:
30888933
17.

The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.

Sharma N, McMahon M, Haigh I, Chen Y, Dall BJG.

Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):310-317. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180809. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

PMID:
30888932
18.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment during Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Park KU, Kuerer HM, Rauch GM, Leung JWT, Sahin AA, Wei W, Li Y, Black DM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar 14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07226-w. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30877499
19.

Association between digital breast tomosynthesis and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Cai S, Yao M, Cai D, Yan J, Huang M, Yan L, Huang H.

Oncol Lett. 2019 Mar;17(3):2669-2676. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9918. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

20.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center