Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jun;141(6):4452. doi: 10.1121/1.4985186.

PMID:
28679277
2.

Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.

D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.

Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517710354. doi: 10.1177/2331216517710354.

3.

Level variations in speech: Effect on masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Reed CM, Desloge JG, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Léger AC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jul;140(1):102. doi: 10.1121/1.4954746.

PMID:
27475136
4.

Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.

Ranjbar P, Wilson EC, Reed CM, Braida LD.

Int J Eng Technol Sci Innov. 2016 Apr;1(2):209-229.

5.

Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Léger AC, Reed CM, Desloge JG, Swaminathan J, Braida LD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):389-403. doi: 10.1121/1.4922949.

6.

The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Léger AC, Desloge JG, Braida LD, Swaminathan J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):505-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4904540.

7.

Masking Release for Igbo and English.

Ebem DU, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Uguru JO.

Afr J Comput Ict. 2013 Sep;6(3):119-126.

8.

Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.

Swaminathan J, Reed CM, Desloge JG, Braida LD, Delhorne LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Apr;135(4):2078-90. doi: 10.1121/1.4865920.

9.

Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA, Villabona TJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Feb;135(2):838-50. doi: 10.1121/1.4861246.

10.

Two-microphone spatial filtering provides speech reception benefits for cochlear implant users in difficult acoustic environments.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Desloge JG, Braida LD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Aug;136(2):867-76. doi: 10.1121/1.4887453.

11.

Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

12.

Dissociation of detection and discrimination of pure tones following bilateral lesions of auditory cortex.

Dykstra AR, Koh CK, Braida LD, Tramo MJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044602. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

13.

Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Mar;16(1):19-39. doi: 10.1177/1084713812445510.

14.

Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):915-32. doi: 10.1121/1.3607599.

15.

Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3884-96. doi: 10.1121/1.3583550.

16.

Integration of auditory and vibrotactile stimuli: effects of frequency.

Wilson EC, Reed CM, Braida LD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3044-59. doi: 10.1121/1.3365318.

17.

Perceptual interactions in the loudness of combined auditory and vibrotactile stimuli.

Wilson EC, Braida LD, Reed CM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):3038-43. doi: 10.1121/1.3377116.

18.

Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.

Kong YY, Braida LD.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Jun;54(3):959-80. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0197). Epub 2010 Nov 8.

19.

Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):342-59. doi: 10.1121/1.3436522. Erratum in: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3253.

20.

Measures of tactual detection and temporal order resolution in congenitally deaf and normal-hearing adults.

Moallem TM, Reed CM, Braida LD.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jun;127(6):3696-709. doi: 10.1121/1.3397432.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center