Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Injury. 2010 Nov;41(11):1103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.023. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation: comparison between two surgical procedures for anatomic reconstruction.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Surgical treatment of chronic complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is still debated and no gold standard surgical procedure has been identified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A retrospective series of 90 patients treated for AC dislocations is reported here. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 receiving AC reconstruction with a Dacron vascular prosthesis; group 2 receiving AC reconstruction with LARS(®) artificial ligament; group 3 receiving conservative treatment. Follow-up was performed after 1, 6 and 15 months with plain radiographs, UCLA, SPADI and modified UCLA acromioclavicular rating scales.

RESULTS:

Patients treated surgically presented significant better functional outcome compared to patients treated conservatively with overall positive results in 93.3% of patients for group 2 and 53.3% of patients for group 1. However, reconstruction with Dacron vascular prosthesis presented an unacceptable high complications rate (43.3%).

CONCLUSION:

Our results show that anatomic AC reconstruction with LARS(®) artificial ligament resulted in both satisfactory functional outcome and low complication rate. Therefore, we recommend this procedure for the treatment of chronic complete AC dislocations.

PMID:
20934695
DOI:
10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center