Format

Send to

Choose Destination
  • Showing results for myositis-specific autoantibodies are specific for myositis compared to genetic muscle disease. Your search for Myositis-specific autoantibodies are specific for myositis compared to genetic muscle diseas retrieved no results.
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015 Nov 19;2(6):e172. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000172. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Myositis-specific autoantibodies are specific for myositis compared to genetic muscle disease.

Author information

1
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (A.L.M.), NIH, Bethesda; the Departments of Neurology (A.L.M., L.C.-S., T.E.L., K.R.W.), Medicine (L.C.-R., L.C.-S.), and Neuroscience (T.E.L., K.R.W.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; and The Hugo W. Moser Research Institute (K.R.W.), Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the specificity of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) for autoimmune myopathy compared with inherited muscle diseases.

METHODS:

Serum samples from 47 patients with genetically confirmed inherited muscle diseases were screened for the most common MSAs, including those recognizing TIF1γ, NXP2, Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, SRP, and HMGCR. We compared these results with the findings in a cohort of patients with dermatomyositis (DM) previously screened for anti-TIF1γ, -NXP2, -Mi2, -MDA5, and -Jo1.

RESULTS:

Overall, the presence of anti-TIF1γ, -NXP2, -Mi2, -MDA5, or -Jo1 was 96% specific and 67% sensitive for DM compared to patients with genetic muscle diseases. No patients with inherited muscle disease had anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR autoantibodies. Only 2 patients with genetic muscle disease had a MSA. One patient with anti-Mi2 autoantibodies had both genetically confirmed facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and dermatomyositis based on a typical skin rash and partial response to immunosuppressive medications. A second patient with anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies had both genetically defined limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A (i.e., calpainopathy) and a systemic autoimmune process based on biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis, sicca symptoms, and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS:

The MSAs tested for in this study are highly specific for autoimmune muscle disease and are rarely, if ever, found in patients who only have genetic muscle disease. In patients with genetic muscle disease, the presence of a MSA should suggest the possibility of a coexisting autoimmune process.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center