Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 6

1.

Differential effects of genetic vs. environmental quality in Drosophila melanogaster suggest multiple forms of condition dependence.

Bonduriansky R, Mallet MA, Arbuthnott D, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Rundle HD.

Ecol Lett. 2015 Apr;18(4):317-26. doi: 10.1111/ele.12412. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

PMID:
25649176
2.

Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Bedhomme S, Chippindale AK, Prasad NG, Delcourt M, Abbott JK, Mallet MA, Rundle HD.

J Genet. 2011 Dec;90(3):443-52.

3.

Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation.

Mallet MA, Kimber CM, Chippindale AK.

Biol Lett. 2012 Jun 23;8(3):426-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0977. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

4.

Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females.

Mallet MA, Bouchard JM, Kimber CM, Chippindale AK.

BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jun 6;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-156.

5.

Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Mallet MA, Chippindale AK.

Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Jun;106(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.148. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

6.

Identification of three distinct Polytomella lineages based on mitochondrial DNA features.

Mallet MA, Lee RW.

J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006 Mar-Apr;53(2):79-84.

PMID:
16579809

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center