Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 44

1.

Corrigendum to "Genetic parameters between feed-intake-related traits and conformation in 2 separate dairy populations-the Netherlands and United States" (J. Dairy Sci. 99:443-457).

Manzanilla-Pech CI, Veerkamp RF, Tempelman RJ, van Pelt ML, Weigel KA, VandeHaar M, Lawlor TJ, Spurlock DM, Armentano LE, Staples CR, Hanigan M, De Haas Y.

J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):4095. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-99-5-4095. No abstract available.

PMID:
27107217
2.

Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.

Masuda Y, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Legarra A, Aguilar I, Lourenco DA, Fragomeni BO, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2016 Mar;99(3):1968-74. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10540.

3.

Genetic parameters between feed-intake-related traits and conformation in 2 separate dairy populations--the Netherlands and United States.

Manzanilla-Pech CI, Veerkamp RF, Tempelman RJ, van Pelt ML, Weigel KA, VandeHaar M, Lawlor TJ, Spurlock DM, Armentano LE, Staples CR, Hanigan M, De Haas Y.

J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jan;99(1):443-57. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9727.

PMID:
26547641
4.

Genotype by environment interactions on culling rates and 305-day milk yield of Holstein cows in 3 US regions.

Tsuruta S, Lourenco DA, Misztal I, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5796-805. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9242.

PMID:
26026751
5.

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.

Fragomeni BO, Lourenco DA, Tsuruta S, Masuda Y, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Lawlor TJ, Misztal I.

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jun;98(6):4090-4. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9125.

6.

Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Lourenco DA, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5814-21. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7821.

PMID:
24997668
7.

Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?

Lourenco DA, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ, Forni S, Weller JI.

J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3930-42. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7769.

PMID:
24679931
8.

Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3332-5. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6272.

PMID:
23477821
9.

Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation.

Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Legarra A, VanRaden PM, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):647-54. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5656.

10.

Effect of sample stratification on dairy GWAS results.

Ma L, Wiggans GR, Wang S, Sonstegard TS, Yang J, Crooker BA, Cole JB, Van Tassell CP, Lawlor TJ, Da Y.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Oct 6;13:536. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-536.

11.

International genetic evaluation of Holstein bulls for overall type traits and body condition score.

Battagin M, Forabosco F, Jakobsen JH, Penasa M, Lawlor TJ, Cassandro M.

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4721-31. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5336.

PMID:
22818485
12.

Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms.

Weigel KA, Hoffman PC, Herring W, Lawlor TJ Jr.

J Dairy Sci. 2012 Apr;95(4):2215-25. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4877.

PMID:
22459867
13.

Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows.

Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Lawlor TJ Jr, Crooker BA, Van Tassell CP, Yang J, Wang S, Matukumalli LK, Da Y.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Aug 11;12:408. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-408.

14.

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Aguilar I, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):4198-204. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4256.

PMID:
21787955
15.

Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins.

Aguilar I, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Wiggans GR, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2621-4. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3893.

PMID:
21524554
16.

Studies on changes of estimated breeding values of U.S. Holstein bulls for final score from the first to second crop of daughters.

Koduru VK, Tsuruta S, Lukaszewicz M, Misztal I, Lawlor TJ.

J Appl Genet. 2011 Feb;52(1):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s13353-010-0010-4.

17.

Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):743-52. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2730.

18.

Trends for conception rate of Holsteins over time in the southeastern United States.

Huang C, Tsuruta S, Bertrand JK, Misztal I, Lawlor TJ, Clay JS.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4641-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1982.

PMID:
19700727
19.

Bivariate analysis of conception rates and test-day milk yields in Holsteins using a threshold-linear model with random regressions.

Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Huang C, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2922-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1707.

PMID:
19448025
20.

Short communication: genotype by environment interaction due to heat stress.

Bohmanova J, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Norman HD, Lawlor TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2008 Feb;91(2):840-6. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-142.

PMID:
18218772
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center