Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 44

1.

The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.

Gilg MM, Zeller CW, Leitner L, Leithner A, Labek G, Sadoghi P.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3272-3279. Epub 2016 May 6. Review.

PMID:
27154281
2.

New regulations for medical devices: Rationale, advances and impact on research and patient care.

Labek G, Schöffl H, Stoica CI.

World J Orthop. 2016 Mar 18;7(3):162-6. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.162. eCollection 2016 Mar 18.

3.

Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades.

Pabinger C, Bridgens A, Berghold A, Wurzer P, Boehler N, Labek G.

Hip Int. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):394-401. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000239. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Review.

PMID:
25837781
4.

CORR Insights(®): do glycemic markers predict occurrence of complications after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes?

Labek G.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1732-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4194-0. Epub 2015 Feb 18. No abstract available.

5.

New medical device regulations ahead - what does that mean for arthroplasty registers?

Labek G, Schöffl H, Meglic M.

Acta Orthop. 2015 Feb;86(1):5-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.1002185. Epub 2015 Jan 13. No abstract available.

6.

CORR Insights®: does HIV infection increase the risk of perioperative complications after THA? A nationwide database study.

Labek G.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):587-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3928-8. Epub 2014 Sep 9. No abstract available.

7.

Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty.

Pabinger C, Lumenta DB, Cupak D, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G.

Acta Orthop. 2015 Feb;86(1):58-62. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.961119. Epub 2014 Sep 5. Review.

9.

The incidence of implant fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Sadoghi P, Pawelka W, Liebensteiner MC, Williams A, Leithner A, Labek G.

Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):39-46. Review.

10.

Outcome after total ankle arthroplasty-results and findings from worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Labek G, Todorov S, Iovanescu L, Stoica CI, Böhler N.

Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1981-7. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

11.

Application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers.

Vielgut I, Kastner N, Pichler K, Holzer L, Glehr M, Gruber G, Leithner A, Labek G, Sadoghi P.

Int Orthop. 2013 Aug;37(8):1465-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1933-2. Epub 2013 May 24.

12.

Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Böhler N, Labek G.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1329-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Apr 18. Review.

PMID:
23602418
13.

Overcoming boundaries of worldwide joint arthroplasty registers: the European Arthroplasty Register minimal dataset.

Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Labek G.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1327-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

PMID:
23540540
14.

Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Sadoghi P, Thaler M, Janda W, Hübl M, Leithner A, Labek G.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Mar 24. Review.

PMID:
23535284
15.

Pooled outcome of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system: a comparative analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty register data.

Sadoghi P, Janda W, Agreiter M, Rauf R, Leithner A, Labek G.

Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):995-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1867-8. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

16.

Quality and reproducibility of French publications on total hip arthroplasty.

Delaunay C, Iovanescu L, Necas L, Hochgatterer R, Labek G; Quality of Literature in Arthroplasty study group of the European Arthroplasty Register..

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 May;99(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

17.

Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers.

Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Feb;21(2):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.014. Epub 2012 Dec 6. Review.

18.

[Revision rates in journal publications on joint prostheses with noticeably high failure rates in register data sets].

Labek G, Todorov S, Lübbeke-Wolff A, Haderer B, Krivanek S.

Orthopade. 2012 Oct;41(10):853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00132-012-1945-4. German.

PMID:
22914916
19.

Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Schuh R, Neumann D, Rauf R, Hofstaetter J, Boehler N, Labek G.

Int Orthop. 2012 Jul;36(7):1349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1502-0. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

20.

Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty.

Labek G, Neumann D, Agreiter M, Schuh R, Böhler N.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01108.

PMID:
22262425

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center