Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 15

1.

Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction.

Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Bartual SG, Bazan JF, Berman H, Casteel DE, Christodoulou E, Everett JK, Hausmann J, Heidebrecht T, Hills T, Hui R, Hunt JF, Seetharaman J, Joachimiak A, Kennedy MA, Kim C, Lingel A, Michalska K, Montelione GT, Otero JM, Perrakis A, Pizarro JC, van Raaij MJ, Ramelot TA, Rousseau F, Tong L, Wernimont AK, Young J, Schwede T.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:6-20. doi: 10.1002/prot.23196.

2.

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round IX.

Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:1-5. doi: 10.1002/prot.23200.

3.

CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:196-207. doi: 10.1002/prot.23182.

4.

Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9.

Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Tramontano A.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:91-106. doi: 10.1002/prot.23180.

5.

Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9.

Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Moult J, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:107-18. doi: 10.1002/prot.23161.

6.

Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.

Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A.

Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10:119-25. doi: 10.1002/prot.23160.

7.

Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures.

Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, Tramontano A.

Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:18-28. doi: 10.1002/prot.22561.

8.

Protein structure prediction center in CASP8.

Kryshtafovych A, Krysko O, Daniluk P, Dmytriv Z, Fidelis K.

Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:5-9. doi: 10.1002/prot.22517.

9.

A comprehensive analysis of the structure-function relationship in proteins based on local structure similarity.

Hvidsten TR, Laegreid A, Kryshtafovych A, Andersson G, Fidelis K, Komorowski J.

PLoS One. 2009 Jul 15;4(7):e6266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006266.

10.

Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts.

Björkholm P, Daniluk P, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Andersson R, Hvidsten TR.

Bioinformatics. 2009 May 15;25(10):1264-70. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp149.

11.

Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research.

Schwede T, Sali A, Honig B, Levitt M, Berman HM, Jones D, Brenner SE, Burley SK, Das R, Dokholyan NV, Dunbrack RL Jr, Fidelis K, Fiser A, Godzik A, Huang YJ, Humblet C, Jacobson MP, Joachimiak A, Krystek SR Jr, Kortemme T, Kryshtafovych A, Montelione GT, Moult J, Murray D, Sanchez R, Sosnick TR, Standley DM, Stouch T, Vajda S, Vasquez M, Westbrook JD, Wilson IA.

Structure. 2009 Feb 13;17(2):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.12.014.

12.

Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.

Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K.

Drug Discov Today. 2009 Apr;14(7-8):386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.010. Review.

13.

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII.

Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A.

Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:3-9.

14.

New tools and expanded data analysis capabilities at the Protein Structure Prediction Center.

Kryshtafovych A, Prlic A, Dmytriv Z, Daniluk P, Milostan M, Eyrich V, Hubbard T, Fidelis K.

Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:19-26.

15.

Rigorous performance evaluation in protein structure modelling and implications for computational biology.

Moult J.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 29;361(1467):453-8. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center