Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

See comment in PubMed Commons below
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10):1440-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ba00.

Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 700 Regent Street, Suite 301, Madison, WI 53715, USA. mlcarnes@wisc.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To systematically review experimental evidence for interventions mitigating gender bias in employment. Unconscious endorsement of gender stereotypes can undermine academic medicine's commitment to gender equity.

METHOD:

The authors performed electronic and hand searches for randomized controlled studies since 1973 of interventions that affect gender differences in evaluation of job applicants. Twenty-seven studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions fell into three categories: application information, applicant features, and rating conditions.

RESULTS:

The studies identified gender bias as the difference in ratings or perceptions of men and women with identical qualifications. Studies reaffirmed negative bias against women being evaluated for positions traditionally or predominantly held by men (male sex-typed jobs). The assessments of male and female raters rarely differed. Interventions that provided raters with clear evidence of job-relevant competencies were effective. However, clearly competent women were rated lower than equivalent men for male sex-typed jobs unless evidence of communal qualities was also provided. A commitment to the value of credentials before review of applicants and women's presence at above 25% of the applicant pool eliminated bias against women. Two studies found unconscious resistance to "antibias" training, which could be overcome with distraction or an intervening task. Explicit employment equity policies and an attractive appearance benefited men more than women, whereas repeated employment gaps were more detrimental to men. Masculine-scented perfume favored the hiring of both sexes. Negative bias occurred against women who expressed anger or who were perceived as self-promoting.

CONCLUSIONS:

High-level evidence exists for strategies to mitigate gender bias in hiring.

PMID:
19881440
PMCID:
PMC4554714
DOI:
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ba00
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center