Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 5

1.

Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.

Håndstad T, Rye M, Močnik R, Drabløs F, Sætrom P.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 3;13:372. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-372.

2.

The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.

Kornacker K, Rye MB, Håndstad T, Drabløs F.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jul 24;13:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-176.

3.

Clustered ChIP-Seq-defined transcription factor binding sites and histone modifications map distinct classes of regulatory elements.

Rye M, Sætrom P, Håndstad T, Drabløs F.

BMC Biol. 2011 Nov 24;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-80.

4.

A ChIP-Seq benchmark shows that sequence conservation mainly improves detection of strong transcription factor binding sites.

Håndstad T, Rye MB, Drabløs F, Sætrom P.

PLoS One. 2011 Apr 14;6(4):e18430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018430.

5.

Motif kernel generated by genetic programming improves remote homology and fold detection.

Håndstad T, Hestnes AJ, Saetrom P.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 25;8:23.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center