Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

A Randomized Study Comparing Digital Imaging to Traditional Glass Slide Microscopy for Breast Biopsy and Cancer Diagnosis.

Elmore JG, Longton GM, Pepe MS, Carney PA, Nelson HD, Allison KH, Geller BM, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Mercan E, Shapiro LG, Brunyé TT, Morgan TR, Weaver DL.

J Pathol Inform. 2017 Mar 10;8:12. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.201920. eCollection 2017.

2.

Pupil diameter changes reflect difficulty and diagnostic accuracy during medical image interpretation.

Brunyé TT, Eddy MD, Mercan E, Allison KH, Weaver DL, Elmore JG.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 5;16:77. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0322-3.

3.

Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.

Elmore JG, Tosteson AN, Pepe MS, Longton GM, Nelson HD, Geller B, Carney PA, Onega T, Allison KH, Jackson SL, Weaver DL.

BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3069. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3069.

4.

Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.

Carney PA, Allison KH, Oster NV, Frederick PD, Morgan TR, Geller BM, Weaver DL, Elmore JG.

Mod Pathol. 2016 Jul;29(7):717-26. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.62. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

5.

Comparative safety of diabetes medications and risk of incident invasive breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Calip GS, Yu O, Elmore JG, Boudreau DM.

Cancer Causes Control. 2016 May;27(5):709-20. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0744-3. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

6.

Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.

Elmore JG, Nelson HD, Pepe MS, Longton GM, Tosteson AN, Geller B, Onega T, Carney PA, Jackson SL, Allison KH, Weaver DL.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 17;164(10):649-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0964. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

7.

How concerns and experiences with medical malpractice affect dermatopathologists' perceptions of their diagnostic practices when interpreting cutaneous melanocytic lesions.

Carney PA, Frederick PD, Reisch LM, Knezevich S, Piepkorn MW, Barnhill RL, Elder DE, Geller BM, Titus L, Weinstock MA, Nelson HD, Elmore JG.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Feb;74(2):317-24; quiz 324.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.037. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

8.

Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology.

Onega T, Reisch LM, Frederick PD, Geller BM, Nelson HD, Lott JP, Radick AC, Elder DE, Barnhill RL, Piepkorn MW, Elmore JG.

J Digit Imaging. 2016 Apr;29(2):243-53. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9836-y.

9.

Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.

Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):456-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13672.

10.

Imaging-based screening: maximizing benefits and minimizing harms.

Germino JC, Elmore JG, Carlos RC, Lee CI.

Clin Imaging. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):339-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 12. Review.

11.

Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Fuller MS, Lee CI, Elmore JG.

Med Clin North Am. 2015 May;99(3):451-68. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Review.

12.

Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.

Elmore JG, Longton GM, Carney PA, Geller BM, Onega T, Tosteson AN, Nelson HD, Pepe MS, Allison KH, Schnitt SJ, O'Malley FP, Weaver DL.

JAMA. 2015 Mar 17;313(11):1122-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1405.

13.

Dermatology in an age of fully transparent electronic medical records.

Lott JP, Piepkorn MW, Elmore JG.

JAMA Dermatol. 2015 May;151(5):477-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.4362. No abstract available.

14.

Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Allison KH, Abraham LA, Weaver DL, Tosteson AN, Nelson HD, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Ichikawa LE, Buist DS, Elmore JG.

Cancer. 2015 May 1;121(9):1369-78. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29199. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

15.

Demographic and practice characteristics of pathologists who enjoy breast tissue interpretation.

Oster NV, Geller BM, Carney PA, Reisch LM, Onega T, Weaver DL, Frederick P, Elmore JG.

Breast. 2015 Apr;24(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

16.

Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits.

Jackson SL, Mejilla R, Darer JD, Oster NV, Ralston JD, Leveille SG, Walker J, Delbanco T, Elmore JG.

J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 12;16(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3363.

17.

Computer-aided detection in mammography: downstream effect on diagnostic testing, ductal carcinoma in situ treatment, and costs.

Fenton JJ, Lee CI, Xing G, Baldwin LM, Elmore JG.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):2032-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5410. No abstract available.

18.

Variability in mitotic figures in serial sections of thin melanomas.

Knezevich SR, Barnhill RL, Elder DE, Piepkorn MW, Reisch LM, Pocobelli G, Carney PA, Elmore JG.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Dec;71(6):1204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.056. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

19.

Development of an electronic breast pathology database in a community health system.

Nelson HD, Weerasinghe R, Martel M, Bifulco C, Assur T, Elmore JG, Weaver DL.

J Pathol Inform. 2014 Jul 30;5(1):26. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.137730. eCollection 2014.

20.

Eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: a pilot study.

Brunyé TT, Carney PA, Allison KH, Shapiro LG, Weaver DL, Elmore JG.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 1;9(8):e103447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103447. eCollection 2014.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center