Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 16

1.

Thin blue lines: product placement and the drama of pregnancy testing in British cinema and television.

Olszynko-Gryn J.

Br J Hist Sci. 2017 Sep;50(3):495-520. doi: 10.1017/S0007087417000619.

2.

Pulse Rate Measurement During Sleep Using Wearable Sensors, and its Correlation with the Menstrual Cycle Phases, A Prospective Observational Study.

Shilaih M, Clerck V, Falco L, Kübler F, Leeners B.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 2;7(1):1294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01433-9.

3.

Urinary paracetamol and time-to-pregnancy.

Smarr MM, Grantz KL, Sundaram R, Maisog JM, Honda M, Kannan K, Buck Louis GM.

Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2119-27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew172. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

4.

Women's experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis.

Jones G, Carlton J, Weddell S, Johnson S, Ledger WL.

Reprod Health. 2015 Dec 21;12:116. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0103-y.

5.

Evaluation of a semi-quantitative pregnancy device for susceptibility to interference caused by hCGβcf.

Nerenz RD, Butch AW, Ashby L, Woldemariam GA, Gronowski AM.

Clin Biochem. 2015 Aug;48(12):815-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

PMID:
25916816
6.

Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.

Johnson S, Cushion M, Bond S, Godbert S, Pike J.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(3):391-402. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0643.

PMID:
25274958
7.

Case reports of the Marquette method.

Peck R.

Linacre Q. 2013 Feb;80(1):24-30. doi: 10.1179/0024363912Z.0000000007.

8.

Home ovulation tests and stress in women trying to conceive: a randomized controlled trial.

Tiplady S, Jones G, Campbell M, Johnson S, Ledger W.

Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):138-51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des372. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

9.

Comparison of a digital ovulation test with three popular line ovulation tests to investigate user accuracy and certainty.

Johnson S, Ellis J, Godbert S, Ali S, Zinaman M.

Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2011 Nov;5(6):467-73. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2011.617737. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

PMID:
23484745
10.

The utility of six over-the-counter (home) pregnancy tests.

Cole LA.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Aug;49(8):1317-22. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.211.

PMID:
21812725
11.

Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration.

Johnson S, Shaw R, Parkinson P, Ellis J, Buchanan P, Zinaman M.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Feb;27(2):393-401. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.545378. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

PMID:
21175374
12.

Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter.

Tomlinson C, Marshall J, Ellis JE.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jun;24(6):1645-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990802120572. Epub 2008 May 2.

PMID:
18457603
13.

Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue Easy Fertility Monitor.

Robinson JE, Wakelin M, Ellis JE.

Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):329-34. Epub 2006 Oct 30.

PMID:
17074329
14.

Sensitivity of over-the-counter pregnancy tests: comparison of utility and marketing messages.

Cole LA, Sutton-Riley JM, Khanlian SA, Borkovskaya M, Rayburn BB, Rayburn WF.

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2005 Sep-Oct;45(5):608-15.

PMID:
16295647
15.

[Evaluation of home pregnancy tests].

Lindhard A, Schmidt L.

Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 May 17;155(20):1550-3. Danish.

PMID:
8316987
16.

Home tests to monitor fertility.

May K.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):2000-2.

PMID:
1755458

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center