Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 31;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1093-1.

A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between regulator quality ratings and care home residents' quality of life in England.

Author information

1
Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK. A.Towers@kent.ac.uk.
2
Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The quality of life of people receiving health and social care is an important indicator of service quality, but the relationship between patient experience and outcomes and regulator quality ratings in England is unknown. In 2013, the health and social care regulator in England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), introduced a new ratings system and by February 2017, all social care services were inspected and awarded new quality ratings (outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate). This study aimed to explore whether quality ratings were associated with residents' quality of life, controlling for confounding variables.

METHODS:

We conducted a nested, cross-sectional study, collecting social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) data for 293 older care home residents in 34 care homes (20 nursing and 14 residential) in the South East of England. CQC ratings and other resident and home-level variables were also collected for the analysis. Multilevel modelling explored whether residents' social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) was associated with regulator ratings, controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS:

Outstanding and good homes were collapsed into one category and compared with homes requiring improvement. Nationally, only 2 % of care homes for older people are rated as inadequate and it was not possible to capture sufficient numbers for the analysis. We recruited one but it was re-inspected during the fieldwork period and its rating changed to requires improvement. The random intercept multilevel model, which accounted for 16.93% of the differences in SCRQoL within homes and 69.80% between, indicated that better SCRQoL was significantly associated with being female, better functioning, no dementia diagnosis, fewer communication difficulties, and living in a care home rated as outstanding/good by CQC. Size of home and registration category were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study found evidence that quality ratings are associated with residents' SCRQoL. As well as aiming to improve quality and ensure minimum standards, quality ratings have the potential to inform user choice and help the public compare care homes based on quality. Future research to establish the generalisability and replicability of the results is required.

KEYWORDS:

Adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT); Care homes; Care quality commission (CQC); Long-term care; National regulator; Quality; Quality of life; Quality ratings

PMID:
30704482
PMCID:
PMC6357453
DOI:
10.1186/s12955-019-1093-1
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center