Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):272-284. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1302. Epub 2018 Sep 9.

Behavioural and neural responses to aversive visceral stimuli in women with primary dysmenorrhoea.

Author information

1
Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
2
Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
3
Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
4
Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
5
University Clinic of Medical Psychology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
6
Institute of Psychology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Graz, Austria.
7
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Chronic pelvic pain, in particular dysmenorrhoea, is a significant yet unresolved healthcare problem in gynaecology. As interoceptive sensitivity and underlying neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood, this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study assessed behavioural and neural responses to visceral stimuli in primary dysmenorrhoea (PMD).

METHODS:

Women with PMD (N = 19) without psychological comorbidity and healthy women (N = 20) were compared with respect to visceral sensory and pain thresholds, and to neural responses to individually calibrated mildly painful and painful rectal distensions implemented during scanning. Trial-by-trial ratings of perceived intensity were accomplished with visual analogue scales (VAS).

RESULTS:

Although women with dysmenorrhoea reported significantly higher chronic pain intensity and pain interference with daily life activities (p < 0.01, assessed with the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory), there were no differences between groups in visceral sensitivity and mean trial-by-trial VAS ratings were virtually identical. Analysis of neural responses revealed activation in brain regions previously shown to be involved in the processing of visceral stimuli with differences between painful and mildly painful stimulation, but no group differences were found even when using a liberal statistical threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dysmenorrhoea patients show unaltered perceptual and neural responses to experimental interoceptive stimuli. Despite limited sample size, these negative results argue against a generalized sensitization towards interoceptive stimuli in patients without psychological comorbidities. Future studies should clarify the role of psychosocial factors in central sensitization using more pain region-specific models in larger and clinically more heterogeneous samples.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Despite higher chronic pain and pain interference with daily life activities, women with primary dysmenorrhoea do not differ from healthy women with respect to visceral sensitivity or neural processing of aversive interoceptive stimuli induced by rectal distensions. Generalized sensitization may be present only in subgroups with pronounced psychosocial or psychiatric disturbances.

PMID:
30098104
PMCID:
PMC6585730
DOI:
10.1002/ejp.1302
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center