Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Impact of a Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Educational Program for Interdisciplinary Teams.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
2
American College of Chest Physicians, Glenview, IL.
3
Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
4
Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.
5
Department of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.
6
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: edell.eric@mayo.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Successful implementation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evidence-based guideline recommendations requires effective educational programs that target all clinicians from interdisciplinary teams. This study describes and evaluates the Engaging an Interdisciplinary Team for NSCLC (GAIN 3.0) experiential learning-based educational curriculum.

METHODS:

GAIN 3.0 was designed to enhance interdisciplinary collaboration for effective NSCLC diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. The program used a flipped classroom model that included an e-learning component prior to a live 6-hour interactive program. The interactive program included hands-on simulations, small group workshops, gamification, and case discussions. Participants included academic and community members of multidisciplinary lung cancer teams. Assessments included an online baseline survey, a pretest and posttest, a program evaluation, a long-term survey (LTS), and on-site faculty evaluation of participants.

RESULTS:

Of 416 attendees to 13 live GAIN 3.0 programs (nine in the United States and four in Europe), 304 (73%) completed the pretest and 187 (45%) completed the posttest. Out of a perfect score of 12 points, program participants had a mean test score of 6.3 ± 2.1 on the pretest (52%) and 7.8 ± 2.1 on the posttest (65%) (P = .03). There was an overall knowledge increase of 13% from pretest to posttest. Most LTS respondents (65%) rated the GAIN 3.0 live programs as "high impact." On the LTS, the areas with the greatest gains in participants who had very high confidence were communication across disciplines, use of a team-based approach, and personalized treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

GAIN 3.0 was a highly successful interdisciplinary activity that improved participants' knowledge, competence, and likely the clinical care provided to patients with NSCLC.

KEYWORDS:

education; flipped classroom; lung cancer; problem based learning; simulation

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center