Format

Send to

Choose Destination
  • The following terms were not found in PubMed: amp;ldquo;just, amp;rdquo;.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Apr;27(2):271-283. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000603.

Controlling Healthcare Costs: Just Cost Effectiveness or "Just" Cost Effectiveness?

Abstract

Meeting healthcare needs is a matter of social justice. Healthcare needs are virtually limitless; however, resources, such as money, for meeting those needs, are limited. How then should we (just and caring citizens and policymakers in such a society) decide which needs must be met as a matter of justice with those limited resources? One reasonable response would be that we should use cost effectiveness as our primary criterion for making those choices. This article argues instead that cost-effectiveness considerations must be constrained by considerations of healthcare justice. The goal of this article will be to provide a preliminary account of how we might distinguish just from unjust or insufficiently just applications of cost-effectiveness analysis to some healthcare rationing problems; specifically, problems related to extraordinarily expensive targeted cancer therapies. Unconstrained compassionate appeals for resources for the medically least well-off cancer patients will be neither just nor cost effective.

KEYWORDS:

National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE); QALYs; bedside rationing; cost-effectiveness; equity; healthcare justice; invisible rationing; medically least well-off; rule of rescue; targeted cancer therapies

PMID:
29509125
DOI:
10.1017/S0963180117000603
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center