Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 20;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9.

Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study.

Author information

1
Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. j.heaton@exeter.ac.uk.
2
Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. j.k.day@exeter.ac.uk.
3
Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2SL, UK. n.britten@exeter.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In 2008, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) began funding a major 5-year pilot research programme of translational research in England, establishing nine 'Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care' (CLAHRCs). A number of evaluations were carried out to examine whether or not the various collaborations worked as intended and why. In this paper, we examine what the theory of co-production adds to understanding of processes of knowledge creation and translation we observed in one of the CLAHRCs.

METHODS:

A case study of a successful knowledge translation project was identified from our wider realist evaluation of the mechanisms of closer collaboration at play in the CLAHRC. In the project, a computer simulation model of an emergency pathway for acute ischaemic stroke was built to explore if and how the time between the onset and treatment of the condition could be minimised by redesigning the pathway. The aim of the case study was to improve our understanding of the nature and workings of the mechanisms of closer collaboration that were associated with the more successful projects by examining the relevance of the theory of co-production. Qualitative methods of analysis were used to explore the fit between the mechanisms of closer collaboration we observed in the realist evaluation and the principles of co-production we identified from the literature.

RESULTS:

We found a close fit between the nine mechanisms of closer collaboration at work in the project and the principles of co-production (active agents; equality of partners; reciprocity and mutuality; transformative; and facilitated). The successful style of collaborative working exemplified by the project was consistent with a strong form of co-production.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our view, the theory of co-production provides useful insights into what it is about the qualities of collaborative working that inspire the requisite mechanisms for generating knowledge that is translated into practice. The theory provides a potentially useful basis for future knowledge translation programmes and projects in applied health research in a range of contexts.

PMID:
26897169
PMCID:
PMC4761144
DOI:
10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center