Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Oct 22;8:542. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1124-7.

Spatial heterogeneity in projected leprosy trends in India.

Author information

1
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
2
International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
3
The South African Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation (DST/NRF) Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
4
Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
5
Yale University, School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
6
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
7
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
8
School of Public Health, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
9
Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. travis.porco@ucsf.edu.
10
Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. travis.porco@ucsf.edu.
11
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. travis.porco@ucsf.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Leprosy is caused by infection with Mycobacterium leprae and is characterized by peripheral nerve damage and skin lesions. The disease is classified into paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) leprosy. The 2012 London Declaration formulated the following targets for leprosy control: (1) global interruption of transmission or elimination by 2020, and (2) reduction of grade-2 disabilities in newly detected cases to below 1 per million population at a global level by 2020. Leprosy is treatable, but diagnosis, access to treatment and treatment adherence (all necessary to curtail transmission) represent major challenges. Globally, new case detection rates for leprosy have remained fairly stable in the past decade, with India responsible for more than half of cases reported annually.

METHODS:

We analyzed publicly available data from the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and fit linear mixed-effects regression models to leprosy case detection trends reported at the district level. We assessed correlation of the new district-level case detection rate for leprosy with several state-level regressors: TB incidence, BCG coverage, fraction of cases exhibiting grade 2 disability at diagnosis, fraction of cases in children, and fraction multibacillary.

RESULTS:

Our analyses suggest an endemic disease in very slow decline, with substantial spatial heterogeneity at both district and state levels. Enhanced active case finding was associated with a higher case detection rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Trend analysis of reported new detection rates from India does not support a thesis of rapid progress in leprosy control.

PMID:
26490137
PMCID:
PMC4618538
DOI:
10.1186/s13071-015-1124-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center