Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):462-74. doi: 10.1002/nur.21681. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites.

Author information

1
Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Yale University West Campus, P.O. Box 27399, West Haven, CT, 06516.
2
Assistant Professor, Yale University School of Nursing, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT.
3
Research Associate, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
4
Doctoral Student, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
5
Founder and President Emeritus, Centering Healthcare Institute, Silver Spring, MD.
6
Professor, Yale University School of Nursing, Yale Child Study Center, West Haven, CT.
7
Research Scientist, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
8
President/CEO, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Clinical Directors Network, Bronx, NY.
9
Professor, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.

Abstract

Group prenatal care improves perinatal outcomes, but implementing this complex model places substantial demands on settings designed for individual care. To describe perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining CenteringPregnancy Plus (CP+) group prenatal care, 24 in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 clinicians, staff, administrators, and study personnel in six of the 14 sites of a randomized trial of the model. All sites served low-income, minority women. Sites for the present evaluation were selected for variation in location, study arm, and initial implementation response. Implementing CP+ was challenging in all sites, requiring substantial adaptations of clinical systems. All sites had barriers to meeting the model's demands, but how sites responded to these barriers affected whether implementation thrived or struggled. Thriving sites had organizational cultures that supported innovation, champions who advocated for CP+, and staff who viewed logistical demands as manageable hurdles. Struggling sites had bureaucratic organizational structures and lacked buy-in and financial resources, and staff were overwhelmed by the model's challenges. Findings suggested that implementing and sustaining health care innovation requires new practices and different ways of thinking, and health systems may not fully recognize the magnitude of change required. Consequently, evidence-based practices are modified or discontinued, and outcomes may differ from those in the original controlled studies. Before implementing new models of care, clinical settings should anticipate model demands and assess capacity for adapting to the disruptions of innovation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00628771.

KEYWORDS:

health care delivery; health systems; implementation science; pregnancy; prenatal care; system change; translational research

PMID:
26340483
PMCID:
PMC4772136
DOI:
10.1002/nur.21681
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center