Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

Point-of-care focused cardiac ultrasound for prediction of pulmonary embolism adverse outcomes.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), right ventricular strain (RVS) on transthoracic echocardiography by Cardiology has been shown to be an independent predictor of 30-day adverse outcomes. However, it is not known how emergency practitioner-performed point-of-care focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) with assessment for RVS compares with other prognostic methods in the Emergency Department (ED).

OBJECTIVES:

To determine whether RVS on FOCUS is a significant predictor of in-hospital adverse outcomes when compared to other risk factors and scoring systems.

METHODS:

Retrospective chart review of patients who were diagnosed with PE and had a FOCUS examination during January 1, 2007 through January 1, 2011 in an urban, academic center with a well-developed ultrasound program. Adverse outcomes were defined as shock, respiratory failure requiring intubation, death, recurrent venous thromboembolism, transition to higher level of care, or major bleeding during hospital admission. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate analysis to assess for prognostic significance.

RESULTS:

One hundred sixty-one patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 25 (16%) patients had an adverse outcome during hospitalization. On univariate analysis, only the presence of altered mental status conferred a higher positive likelihood ratio (6.4 vs. 4.0) than RVS, whereas absence of RVS had the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.45). On multivariate analysis, RVS and cardiopulmonary disease were the only predictors of adverse outcomes that achieved statistical significance, with odds ratio of 9.2 and 3.4, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

In this retrospective chart review, a FOCUS examination for RVS performed by emergency care practitioners of varying experience level was a significant predictor of in-hospital adverse outcomes among patients diagnosed with PE in the ED. Future research should be directed at exploring ways to incorporate RVS assessment into ED prognostic models for pulmonary embolism.

KEYWORDS:

point-of-care; prognosis; pulmonary embolism; right ventricular strain; ultrasound

PMID:
23827166
DOI:
10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center