Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int Endod J. 2013 Jan;46(1):79-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02113.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

Should pulp chamber pulpotomy be seen as a permanent treatment? Some preliminary thoughts.

Author information

1
Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM UMRS872 Eq.5, Paris, France. simon@univ-paris-diderot.fr

Abstract

AIM:

To investigate the benefits of pulpotomy (to the level of the floor of the pulp chamber) as an endodontic treatment for teeth with vital pulps.

METHODOLOGY:

Seventeen patients, aged 7-54 years (mean of 37.2 year), were treated by pulpotomy and filling with ProRoot MTA(®) in premolar or molar teeth with vital pulps and without clinical evidence of irreversible pulpitis. The patients were then followed up for 12 to 24 months and the teeth then assessed by clinical and radiographic examination. Statistical analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival probability statistics to estimate the survival of the treated teeth.

RESULTS:

At 24 months, the survival rate without any complementary treatment was estimated to be 82%. Two of the 17 treated teeth required root canal treatment for pain control and one for prosthetic reasons.

CONCLUSIONS:

Under the conditions of this study, pulpotomy offered a viable alternative to root canal treatment for teeth with vital pulps in the short term. However, there is insufficient clinical evidence to consider this technique for the treatment of every permanent tooth. Nevertheless, it should be considered as a potential alternative approach to be further developed for future applications.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center