Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jun;48(5):424-30. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2010.486381.

A multicenter comparison of the safety of oral versus intravenous acetylcysteine for treatment of acetaminophen overdose.

Author information

1
Toxicology Investigator Network Authorship Group Wilford Hall Medical Center, USA.

Erratum in

  • Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Aug;48(7):770.

Abstract

Oral and intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) are used for the treatment of acetaminophen poisoning. The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the safety of these two routes of administration.

METHODS:

We conducted a multicenter chart review of all patients treated with NAC for acetaminophen poisoning. The primary safety outcome was the percentage of patients with NAC-related adverse events.

RESULTS:

A total of 503 subjects were included in the safety analysis (306 IV-only, 145 oral-only, and 52 both routes). There were no serious adverse events related to NAC for either route. Nausea and vomiting were the most common related adverse events and were more common with oral treatment (23 vs. 9%). Anaphylactoid reactions were more common with IV administration (6 vs. 2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

IV and oral NAC are generally mild adverse drug reactions.

PMID:
20524832
PMCID:
PMC2894984
DOI:
10.3109/15563650.2010.486381
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center