Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 May 15;159(10):915-21.

Control selection strategies in case-control studies of childhood diseases.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. xiaomei.ma@yale.edu

Abstract

To address concerns regarding the representativeness of controls in case-control studies, two selection strategies were evaluated in a study of childhood leukemia, which commenced in California in 1995. The authors selected two controls per case: one from among children identified by using computerized birth records and located successfully, the other from a roster of friends; both were matched on demographic factors. Sixty-four birth certificate-friend control pairs were enrolled (n = 128). Additionally, 192 "ideal" controls were selected without tracing from the birth records. Data on parental ages, parental education, mother's reproductive history, and birth weight were obtained from the birth certificates of all 320 subjects. For all variables except birth weight, the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls were smaller than those between friend and ideal controls. None of the differences between birth certificate and ideal controls was significant, whereas two factors were significantly different between friend and ideal controls. These findings suggest that friend controls may be less representative than birth certificate controls. Despite difficulty in tracing and a seemingly low participation rate (49.0% for 560 enrolled birth certificate controls), using birth records to recruit controls appears to provide a representative sample of children and an opportunity to assess the representativeness of controls.

PMID:
15128601
DOI:
10.1093/aje/kwh136
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center