Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 53

1.

Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring.

Cordier T, Forster D, Dufresne Y, Martins CIM, Stoeck T, Pawlowski J.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Jul 17. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12926. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30014577
2.

Capture enrichment of aquatic environmental DNA: A first proof of concept.

Wilcox TM, Zarn KE, Piggott MP, Young MK, McKelvey KS, Schwartz MK.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Jul 16. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12928. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30009542
3.

Entomological signatures in honey: an environmental DNA metabarcoding approach can disclose information on plant-sucking insects in agricultural and forest landscapes.

Utzeri VJ, Schiavo G, Ribani A, Tinarelli S, Bertolini F, Bovo S, Fontanesi L.

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 3;8(1):9996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27933-w.

4.

The effect of tides on nearshore environmental DNA.

Kelly RP, Gallego R, Jacobs-Palmer E.

PeerJ. 2018 Mar 19;6:e4521. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4521. eCollection 2018.

5.

A cross-taxa study using environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding to measure biological impacts of offshore oil and gas drilling and production operations.

Laroche O, Wood SA, Tremblay LA, Ellis JI, Lear G, Pochon X.

Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Feb;127:97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.042. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

PMID:
29475721
6.

Collaborative environmental DNA sampling from petal surfaces of flowering cherry Cerasus × yedoensis 'Somei-yoshino' across the Japanese archipelago.

Ohta T, Kawashima T, Shinozaki NO, Dobashi A, Hiraoka S, Hoshino T, Kanno K, Kataoka T, Kawashima S, Matsui M, Nemoto W, Nishijima S, Suganuma N, Suzuki H, Taguchi YH, Takenaka Y, Tanigawa Y, Tsuneyoshi M, Yoshitake K, Sato Y, Yamashita R, Arakawa K, Iwasaki W.

J Plant Res. 2018 Jul;131(4):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1017-x. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

PMID:
29460198
7.

Metagenomic sequencing of environmental DNA reveals marine faunal assemblages from the West Antarctic Peninsula.

Cowart DA, Murphy KR, Cheng CC.

Mar Genomics. 2018 Feb;37:148-160. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

8.

Wanted dead or alive? Using metabarcoding of environmental DNA and RNA to distinguish living assemblages for biosecurity applications.

Pochon X, Zaiko A, Fletcher LM, Laroche O, Wood SA.

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187636. eCollection 2017.

9.

Environmental DNA detection of rare and invasive fish species in two Great Lakes tributaries.

Balasingham KD, Walter RP, Mandrak NE, Heath DD.

Mol Ecol. 2018 Jan;27(1):112-127. doi: 10.1111/mec.14395. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

PMID:
29087006
10.

Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.

Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L.

Mol Ecol. 2017 Nov;26(21):5872-5895. doi: 10.1111/mec.14350. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Review.

11.

Persistence of marine fish environmental DNA and the influence of sunlight.

Andruszkiewicz EA, Sassoubre LM, Boehm AB.

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 15;12(9):e0185043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185043. eCollection 2017.

12.

Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA.

Sigsgaard EE, Nielsen IB, Bach SS, Lorenzen ED, Robinson DP, Knudsen SW, Pedersen MW, Jaidah MA, Orlando L, Willerslev E, Møller PR, Thomsen PF.

Nat Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 21;1(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0004.

PMID:
28812572
13.

Application of environmental DNA to detect an endangered marine skate species in the wild.

Weltz K, Lyle JM, Ovenden J, Morgan JAT, Moreno DA, Semmens JM.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):e0178124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178124. eCollection 2017.

14.

Metabarcoding monitoring analysis: the pros and cons of using co-extracted environmental DNA and RNA data to assess offshore oil production impacts on benthic communities.

Laroche O, Wood SA, Tremblay LA, Lear G, Ellis JI, Pochon X.

PeerJ. 2017 May 17;5:e3347. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3347. eCollection 2017.

15.

The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA.

Freeland JR.

Genome. 2017 Apr;60(4):358-374. doi: 10.1139/gen-2016-0100. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

PMID:
28177833
16.

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals primary chemical contaminants in freshwater sediments from different land-use types.

Xie Y, Wang J, Yang J, Giesy JP, Yu H, Zhang X.

Chemosphere. 2017 Apr;172:201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.117. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

PMID:
28068572
17.

Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.

Thomsen PF, Møller PR, Sigsgaard EE, Knudsen SW, Jørgensen OA, Willerslev E.

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0165252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165252. eCollection 2016.

18.

The diversity of arthropods in homes across the United States as determined by environmental DNA analyses.

Madden AA, Barberán A, Bertone MA, Menninger HL, Dunn RR, Fierer N.

Mol Ecol. 2016 Dec;25(24):6214-6224. doi: 10.1111/mec.13900. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

PMID:
27801965
19.

Assessing myxozoan presence and diversity using environmental DNA.

Hartikainen H, Bass D, Briscoe AG, Knipe H, Green AJ, Okamura B.

Int J Parasitol. 2016 Nov;46(12):781-792. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 10.

PMID:
27623220
20.

A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA.

Shelton AO, O'Donnell JL, Samhouri JF, Lowell N, Williams GD, Kelly RP.

Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1645-1659. doi: 10.1890/15-1733.1.

PMID:
27755698

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center