Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 88

  • The following term was not found in PubMed: graftings[MeSH Terms].
1.

Lateral rim mesh in primary total hip arthroplasty: a suitable option to reconstruct segmental acetabular bone defects in young patients?

Colo E, Leenders LAM, Rijnen WHC, Schreurs BW, Hannink G.

Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1):96-103. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0561.R2.

PMID:
30601046
2.

Bone mineral density changes in the graft after acetabular impaction bone grafting in primary and revision hip surgery.

Gerhardt DMJM, De Visser E, Hendrickx BW, Schreurs BW, Van Susante JLC.

Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):302-307. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1460776. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

3.

Acetabular Reconstructions with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Concise Follow-up, at 27 to 35 Years, of a Previous Report.

Schmitz MWJL, Hannink G, Gardeniers JWM, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJJH, Schreurs BW.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1640-1646. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00638.

PMID:
28976428
4.

Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.

Colo E, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2462-2468. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

5.

Predictors of unsuccessful outcome in cemented femoral revisions using bone impaction grafting; Cox regression analysis of 208 cases.

Te Stroet MA, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW, Hannink G.

Hip Int. 2016 Sep 29;26(5):444-450. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000370. Epub 2016 May 11.

PMID:
27174070
6.

A cemented cup with acetabular impaction bone grafting is more cost-effective than an uncemented cup in patients under 50 years.

Busch VJ, Verschueren J, Adang EM, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Schreurs BW.

Hip Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):43-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000301. Epub 2015 Dec 25.

PMID:
26743037
7.

Acetabular revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component: comparison of the Kaplan-Meier analysis to the competing risk analysis in 62 revisions with 25 to 30 years follow-up.

Te Stroet MA, Keurentjes JC, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW.

Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.34984.

PMID:
26430007
8.

The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup.

Colo E, Rijnen WH, Schreurs BW.

Hip Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):361-7. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000267. Epub 2015 May 20. Review.

PMID:
26044533
9.
10.

Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Te Stroet MA, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3867-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4293-y.

11.

Acetabular re-revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup; a biological option for successive reconstructions.

Schreurs BW, Te Stroet MA, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW.

Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):44-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000193. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

PMID:
25362880
12.

Porous titanium particles for acetabular reconstruction in total hip replacement show extensive bony armoring after 15 weeks. A loaded in vivo study in 10 goats.

Walschot LH, Aquarius R, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Schreurs BW.

Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):600-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.960660. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

13.

Antibiotic mixing through impacted bone grafts does not seem indicated in two-stage cemented hip revisions for septic loosening.

Elbers JB, Leijtens B, van Werven HE, Sturm PD, Kullberg BJ, Schreurs BW.

Hip Int. 2014 Dec 5;24(6):596-603. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000159. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

PMID:
25096448
14.

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture.

Bronsema E, te Stroet MA, Zengerink M, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW.

Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2441-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2411-1. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

PMID:
24966082
15.

Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem.

Heyligers IC, Schreurs BW, van Haaren EH.

Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Apr;26(2):156-61. doi: 10.1007/s00064-013-0272-1. Epub 2014 Apr 5.

PMID:
24699925
16.

Comparison of contamination of femoral heads and pre-processed bone chips during hip revision arthroplasty.

Mathijssen NM, Sturm PD, Pilot P, Bloem RM, Buma P, Petit PL, Schreurs BW.

Cell Tissue Bank. 2013 Dec;14(4):615-20. doi: 10.1007/s10561-013-9362-4. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

PMID:
23358959
17.

Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisions.

Schmitz MW, Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Hendriks JC, Veth RP, Schreurs BW.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 22;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-37.

18.

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem: a concise follow-up, at fifteen to twenty years, of a previous report.

te Stroet MA, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Rijnen WH, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 5;94(23):e1731-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01432.

PMID:
23224393
19.

Osteoconduction of impacted porous titanium particles with a calcium-phosphate coating is comparable to osteoconduction of impacted allograft bone particles: in vivo study in a nonloaded goat model.

Walschot LH, Aquarius R, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, Buma P.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 Aug;100(6):1483-9. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32716. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

PMID:
22707449
20.

Impregnation of bone chips with alendronate and cefazolin, combined with demineralized bone matrix: a bone chamber study in goats.

Mathijssen NM, Hannink G, Pilot P, Schreurs BW, Bloem RM, Buma P.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Mar 24;13:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-44.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center