Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 3923

1.

What trial participants need to be told about placebo effects to give informed consent: a survey to establish existing knowledge among patients with back pain.

Hughes J, Greville-Harris M, Graham CA, Lewith G, White P, Bishop FL.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 29. pii: medethics-2016-103964. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103964. [Epub ahead of print]

2.

When 'Sanctity of Life' and 'Self-Determination' clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 - implications for policy and practice.

Kitzinger J, Kitzinger C, Cowley J.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul;43(7):446-449. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104118. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

3.

A Plutocratic Proposal: an ethical way for rich patients to pay for a place on a clinical trial.

Masters A, Nutt D.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 6. pii: medethics-2016-104050. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104050. [Epub ahead of print]

4.

Nudges in a post-truth world.

Levy N.

J Med Ethics. 2017 May 19. pii: medethics-2017-104153. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104153. [Epub ahead of print]

5.

Is imperfection becoming easier to live with for doctors?

Førde R, Aasland OG.

Clin Ethics. 2017 Mar;12(1):31-36. doi: 10.1177/1477750916682618. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

6.

Pathogenic variants in the healthy elderly: unique ethical and practical challenges.

Lacaze P, Ryan J, Woods R, Winship I, McNeil J.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 24. pii: medethics-2016-103967. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103967. [Epub ahead of print]

7.

3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues.

Vermeulen N, Haddow G, Seymour T, Faulkner-Jones A, Shu W.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 20. pii: medethics-2015-103347. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103347. [Epub ahead of print]

8.

Identity change and informed consent.

Witt K.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;43(6):384-390. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103684. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

9.

Discourses of prejudice in the professions: the case of sign languages.

Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C, Rathmann C, Smith S.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 9. pii: medethics-2015-103242. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103242. [Epub ahead of print]

10.

Incentives, Nudges and the Burden of Proof in Ethical Argument.

Ashcroft RE.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Mar;43(3):137. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104198. No abstract available.

11.

"The Danger of Lurking": Different Conceptualizations of "User Awareness" in Social Media Research.

Samuel G.

Am J Bioeth. 2017 Mar;17(3):25-26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1274793. No abstract available.

12.

Clashes of consensus: on the problem of both justifying abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and rejecting infanticide.

Friberg-Fernros H.

Theor Med Bioeth. 2017 Jun;38(3):195-212. doi: 10.1007/s11017-017-9398-8.

13.

Ways Out of the Patenting Prohibition? Human Parthenogenetic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Schickl H, Braun M, Dabrock P.

Bioethics. 2017 Jun;31(5):409-417. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12334. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

14.

Trials are already being prioritised, just not at the institutional level.

Kolstoe S.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 6. pii: medethics-2016-104000. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-104000. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

15.

Investigating Public trust in Expert Knowledge: Narrative, Ethics, and Engagement.

Camporesi S, Vaccarella M, Davis M.

J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9767-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

16.

Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns.

Snyder J, Crooks VA, Mathers A, Chow-White P.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;43(6):364-367. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103933. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

17.

Ethics and high-value care.

DeCamp M, Tilburt JC.

J Med Ethics. 2017 May;43(5):307-309. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103880. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

18.

The Moral of the Tale: Stories, Trust, and Public Engagement with Clinical Ethics via Radio and Theatre.

Bowman D.

J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9766-5. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

19.

An activist's argument that participant values should guide risk-benefit ratio calculations in HIV cure research.

Evans D.

J Med Ethics. 2017 Feb;43(2):100-103. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103120. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

20.

Reconfiguring Social Value in Health Research Through the Lens of Liminality.

Ganguli-Mitra A, Dove ES, Laurie GT, Taylor-Alexander S.

Bioethics. 2017 Feb;31(2):87-96. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12324.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center