Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Best matches for "Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects"[MAJR:

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 3297

1.

Role of Mitochondria in the Oxidative Stress Induced by Electromagnetic Fields: Focus on Reproductive Systems.

Santini SJ, Cordone V, Falone S, Mijit M, Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Di Emidio G.

Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Nov 8;2018:5076271. doi: 10.1155/2018/5076271. eCollection 2018. Review.

2.

Radiations and male fertility.

Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Dec 9;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1. Review.

3.

The physiopathological effects of quercetin on oxidative stress in radiation of 4.5 g mobile phone exposed liver tissue of rat.

Postaci I, Coskun O, Senol N, Aslankoc R, Comlekci S.

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(8):481-489. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2018_088.

PMID:
30160155
4.

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated deficiency does not result in genetic susceptibility to 50 Hz magnetic fields exposure in mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

Sun C, Wei X, Yimaer A, Xu Z, Chen G.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2018 Sep;39(6):476-484. doi: 10.1002/bem.22140. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

PMID:
30091795
5.

Scaling Relationship of In Vivo Muscle Contraction Strength of Rabbits Exposed to High-Frequency Nanosecond Pulse Bursts.

Mi Y, Xu J, Tang X, Bian C, Liu H, Yang Q, Tang J.

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818788078. doi: 10.1177/1533033818788078.

6.

Effects of 900-MHz electromagnetic fields exposure throughout middle/late adolescence on the kidney morphology and biochemistry of the female rat.

Okatan DÖ, Okatan AE, Hancı H, Demir S, Yaman SÖ, Çolakoğlu S, Odacı E.

Toxicol Ind Health. 2018 Oct;34(10):693-702. doi: 10.1177/0748233718781292. Epub 2018 Jul 15.

PMID:
30009691
7.

Nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure does not induce the unfolded protein response in adult human dermal fibroblasts.

Martens SL, Roth CC, Ibey BL.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2018 Sep;39(6):491-499. doi: 10.1002/bem.22131. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

PMID:
29984845
8.

Understanding the effects of electromagnetic field emissions from Marine Renewable Energy Devices (MREDs) on the commercially important edible crab, Cancer pagurus (L.).

Scott K, Harsanyi P, Lyndon AR.

Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Jun;131(Pt A):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.04.062. Epub 2018 May 3.

PMID:
29886985
9.

SAR investigations on the exposure compliance of wearable wireless devices using infrared thermography.

Karthik V, Rao TR.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2018 Sep;39(6):451-459. doi: 10.1002/bem.22133. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

PMID:
29869805
10.

Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields. The situation in Greece.

Gourzoulidis GA, Tsaprouni P, Skamnakis Ν, Tzoumanika C, Kalampaliki E, Karastergios E, Gialofas A, Achtipis A, Kappas C, Karabetsos E.

Phys Med. 2018 May;49:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 12.

PMID:
29866347
11.

Effect of Electromagnetic Waves from Mobile Phones on Spermatogenesis in the Era of 4G-LTE.

Oh JJ, Byun SS, Lee SE, Choe G, Hong SK.

Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 29;2018:1801798. doi: 10.1155/2018/1801798. eCollection 2018.

12.

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band.

de Miguel-Bilbao S, Blas J, Ramos V.

J Vis Exp. 2018 May 2;(135). doi: 10.3791/56525.

14.

Characteristics of perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity in the general population.

Gruber MJ, Palmquist E, Nordin S.

Scand J Psychol. 2018 Aug;59(4):422-427. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12449. Epub 2018 May 9.

PMID:
29741795
15.

Wireless Phone Use and Risk of Adult Glioma: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.

Wang P, Hou C, Li Y, Zhou D.

World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e629-e636. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.122. Epub 2018 Apr 28.

PMID:
29709736
16.

Selenium supplementation ameliorates electromagnetic field-induced oxidative stress in the HEK293 cells.

Pastacı Özsobacı N, Düzgün Ergün D, Durmuş S, Tunçdemir M, Uzun H, Gelişgen R, Özçelik D.

J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018 Dec;50:572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

PMID:
29685784
17.

Exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted from mobile phones induced DNA damage in human ear canal hair follicle cells.

Akdag M, Dasdag S, Canturk F, Akdag MZ.

Electromagn Biol Med. 2018;37(2):66-75. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2018.1463246. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

PMID:
29667447
18.

Does precautionary information about electromagnetic fields trigger nocebo responses? An experimental risk communication study.

Boehmert C, Verrender A, Pauli M, Wiedemann P.

Environ Health. 2018 Apr 12;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y.

19.

Electromagnetic radiation and behavioural response of ticks: an experimental test.

Vargová B, Majláth I, Kurimský J, Cimbala R, Kosterec M, Tryjanowski P, Jankowiak Ł, Raši T, Majláthová V.

Exp Appl Acarol. 2018 May;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s10493-018-0253-z. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

PMID:
29605834
20.

Estimates of Environmental Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Risk of Lymphoma Subtypes.

Satta G, Mascia N, Serra T, Salis A, Saba L, Sanna S, Zucca MG, Angelucci E, Gabbas A, Culurgioni F, Pili P, Mura E, Cappai M, Ennas MG, Cocco P.

Radiat Res. 2018 May;189(5):541-547. doi: 10.1667/RR14952.1. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

PMID:
29547352

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center