Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 14

1.

Cost-effectiveness of 3 methods to enhance the sensitivity of Papanicolaou testing.

Brown AD, Garber AM.

JAMA. 1999 Jan 27;281(4):347-53.

PMID:
9929088
2.

Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.

Karnon J, Peters J, Platt J, Chilcott J, McGoogan E, Brewer N.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(20):iii, 1-78. Review.

3.

Cost-effectiveness of primarily human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening in settings with currently established Pap screening: a systematic review commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Health.

Mühlberger N, Sroczynski G, Esteban E, Mittendorf T, Miksad RA, Siebert U.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Spring;24(2):184-92. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080264. Review.

PMID:
18400122
4.

Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Fahs MC, Plichta SB, Mandelblatt JS.

Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Mar;9(3):211-30. Review.

PMID:
10160098
5.
6.

Assessment of cervical cancer screening and follow-up programs.

Celentano DD, deLissovoy G.

Public Health Rev. 1989-1990;17(2-3):173-240. Review.

PMID:
2518819
8.

[Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].

Ronco G, Confortini M, Maccallini V, Naldoni C, Segnan N, Sideri M, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Calvia M, Giorgi Rossi P.

Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. Review. Italian.

9.

Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.

Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, Matchar DB.

Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):810-9. Review.

PMID:
10819705
10.

Technologic advances for evaluation of cervical cytology: is newer better?

Hartmann KE, Nanda K, Hall S, Myers E.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Dec;56(12):765-74. Review.

PMID:
11753179
11.

Evaluation of costs and benefits of advances in cytologic technology. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.

Melamed MR, Hutchinson ML, Kaufman EA, Schechter CB, Garner D, Kobler TP, Krieger PA, Reith A, Schenck U.

Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):69-75. Review.

PMID:
9479325
12.

The role of Pap test screening against cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meggiolaro A, Unim B, Semyonov L, Miccoli S, Maffongelli E, La Torre G.

Clin Ter. 2016 Jul-Aug;167(4):124-39. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1942. Review.

PMID:
27598026
13.

The annual Pap test: a dubious policy success.

Foltz AM, Kelsey JL.

Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1978 Fall;56(4):426-62. Review.

PMID:
104191
14.

Supplemental Content

Support Center