Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 16

1.

Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.

Altman DG.

BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1309-12. Review. No abstract available.

2.

Number needed to treat and number needed to harm are not the best way to report and assess the results of randomised clinical trials.

Hutton JL.

Br J Haematol. 2009 Jun;146(1):27-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07707.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27. Review.

PMID:
19438480
3.

Trend in randomized controlled trials.

Băicuş C.

Rom J Intern Med. 2003;41(3):329-32. Review.

PMID:
15526517
4.

Evidence-based dermatology: number needed to treat and its relation to other risk measures.

Manriquez JJ, Villouta MF, Williams HC.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Apr;56(4):664-71. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Review.

PMID:
17367615
5.

Calculation of NNTs in RCTs with time-to-event outcomes: a literature review.

Hildebrandt M, Vervölgyi E, Bender R.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Mar 20;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-21. Review.

6.

Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.

Christensen E.

J Hepatol. 2007 May;46(5):947-54. Epub 2007 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
17412447
7.

Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.

Kraemer HC, Kupfer DJ.

Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):990-6. Epub 2005 Dec 20. Review.

PMID:
16368078
8.

Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.

Hertzog MA.

Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247. Review.

PMID:
18183564
9.
10.
11.

Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.

Mayne TJ, Whalen E, Vu A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):217-23. Epub 2005 Oct 13. Review.

PMID:
16488351
12.

Bootstrapping: estimating confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios.

Campbell MK, Torgerson DJ.

QJM. 1999 Mar;92(3):177-82. Review.

PMID:
10326078
13.

Thromboembolism in orthopaedics--observation and experiment.

Warwick D.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):118-21. Review.

14.
15.

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.

Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. Review.

16.

Reading and interpreting research: focus on effect size.

Holm K, Lanuza DM.

Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Spring;23(2):95-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
18843834

Supplemental Content

Support Center